Jülg B, Goebel F D
Dept. of Infectious Diseases, Medical Policlinic, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Pettenkoferstrasse 8a, 80336 Munich, Germany.
Infection. 2006 Jun;34(3):186-8. doi: 10.1007/s15010-006-6306-y.
Continuous HAART is standard of care for HIV-infected patients but lifelong adherence and tolerance are important concerns. Use of ART is associated with potential risks, e. g., adverse events, metabolic and cardiovascular complications, and HIV resistance. Stopping HIV therapy may reduce costs and side effects, but carries the risk of increased immune suppression and of emergence of resistance. Treatment interruption is a strategy of much interest, but its safety and efficacy have not been established. The clinical and biological characteristics that influence the outcome of structured treatment interruptions have not been fully clarified. In the following we will present the results of recent studies aimed to compare the long-term consequences of two antiretroviral-management strategies: continuous therapy versus scheduled treatment interruption.
持续高效抗逆转录病毒疗法(HAART)是HIV感染患者的标准治疗方法,但终身坚持治疗和耐受性是重要的关注点。抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)的使用存在潜在风险,例如不良事件、代谢和心血管并发症以及HIV耐药性。停止HIV治疗可能会降低成本和副作用,但存在免疫抑制增强和耐药性出现的风险。治疗中断是一个备受关注的策略,但其安全性和有效性尚未确立。影响结构化治疗中断结果的临床和生物学特征尚未完全阐明。在接下来的内容中,我们将展示近期研究的结果,这些研究旨在比较两种抗逆转录病毒管理策略的长期后果:持续治疗与定期治疗中断。