Warren David K, Cosgrove Sara E, Diekema Daniel J, Zuccotti Gianna, Climo Michael W, Bolon Maureen K, Tokars Jerome I, Noskin Gary A, Wong Edward S, Sepkowitz Kent A, Herwaldt Loreen A, Perl Trish M, Solomon Steven L, Fraser Victoria J
Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006 Jul;27(7):662-9. doi: 10.1086/506184. Epub 2006 Jun 9.
Education-based interventions can reduce the incidence of catheter-associated bloodstream infection. The generalizability of findings from single-center studies is limited.
To assess the effect of a multicenter intervention to prevent catheter-associated bloodstream infections.
An observational study with a planned intervention.
Twelve intensive care units and 1 bone marrow transplantation unit at 6 academic medical centers.
Patients admitted during the study period.
Updates of written policies, distribution of a 9-page self-study module with accompanying pretest and posttest, didactic lectures, and incorporation into practice of evidence-based guidelines regarding central venous catheter (CVC) insertion and care.
Standard data collection tools and definitions were used to measure the process of care (ie, the proportion of nontunneled catheters inserted into the femoral vein and the condition of the CVC insertion site dressing for both tunneled and nontunneled catheters) and the incidence of catheter-associated bloodstream infection.
Between the preintervention period and the postintervention period, the percentage of CVCs inserted into the femoral vein decreased from 12.9% to 9.4% (relative ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.88); the total proportion of catheter insertion site dressings properly dated increased from 26.6% to 34.4% (relative ratio, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.17-1.42), and the overall rate of catheter-associated bloodstream infections decreased from 11.2 to 8.9 infections per 1,000 catheter-days (relative rate, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.67-0.93). The effect of the intervention varied among individual units.
An education-based intervention that uses evidence-based practices can be successfully implemented in a diverse group of medical and surgical units and reduce catheter-associated bloodstream infection rates.
基于教育的干预措施可降低导管相关血流感染的发生率。单中心研究结果的可推广性有限。
评估一项多中心干预措施对预防导管相关血流感染的效果。
一项带有计划干预的观察性研究。
6家学术医疗中心的12个重症监护病房和1个骨髓移植病房。
研究期间收治的患者。
更新书面政策,分发一份9页的自学模块并附带预测试和后测试,进行教学讲座,并将关于中心静脉导管(CVC)插入和护理的循证指南纳入实践。
使用标准数据收集工具和定义来衡量护理过程(即非隧道式导管插入股静脉的比例以及隧道式和非隧道式导管的CVC插入部位敷料情况)和导管相关血流感染的发生率。
在干预前期和干预后期之间,插入股静脉的CVC百分比从12.9%降至9.4%(相对比率,0.73;95%置信区间[CI],0.61 - 0.88);导管插入部位敷料正确标注日期的总比例从26.6%增至34.4%(相对比率,1.29;95%CI,1.17 - 1.42),且导管相关血流感染的总体发生率从每1000导管日11.2例感染降至8.9例感染(相对比率,0.79;95%CI,0.67 - 0.93)。干预效果在各个单位之间有所不同。
采用循证实践的基于教育的干预措施能够在不同的医疗和外科科室成功实施,并降低导管相关血流感染率。