• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算肌酐清除率的公式不足以确定膀胱癌患者是否适合接受基于顺铂的化疗。

Formulas calculating creatinine clearance are inadequate for determining eligibility for Cisplatin-based chemotherapy in bladder cancer.

作者信息

Raj Ganesh V, Iasonos Alexia, Herr Harry, Donat Sherri Machele

机构信息

Department of Urology, 353 E 68th St, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jul 1;24(19):3095-100. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.3091.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.2005.04.3091
PMID:16809735
Abstract

PURPOSE

Efficacy of formulas calculating creatinine clearance (CrCl) to determine renal function eligibility (CrCl > 60 mL/min) for cisplatin-based chemotherapy has not been examined adequately in the bladder cancer population. We hypothesize these formulas may underestimate measured CrCl, and therefore the eligibility for cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A database of 208 patients with unresectable or metastatic bladder cancer treated on protocol at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (New York, NY) with cisplatin-based chemotherapy between 1983 and 1994 was examined retrospectively. The association between measured and calculated CrCl and the ability to complete three cycles (minimum therapeutic) of chemotherapy was examined.

RESULTS

Baseline measured CrCl was less than 60 mL/min in 16% compared with 12% to 44% using various formulas. Concordance between calculated and measured CrCl less than 60 mL/min was poor (range of kappa, 0.14 to 0.38). In patients older than age 65, 22% had a measured CrCl less than 60 mL/min, compared with 10% to 63% calculated using various formulas. Overall, 80% completed at least three cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The ability to complete at least three cycles was statistically significantly related with a measured CrCl more than 60 mL/min (P = .02), but not with calculated CrCl more than 60 mL/min.

CONCLUSION

Current formulas estimating CrCl tend to underestimate measured CrCl, especially in those older than 65 years. Depending on the formula used, up to 44% who actually received cisplatin-based chemotherapy based on measured CrCl would be deemed ineligible at present, potentially affecting survival outcomes. Methodology for determining CrCl and/or renal eligibility for cisplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with bladder cancer should be re-examined.

摘要

目的

计算肌酐清除率(CrCl)以确定基于顺铂化疗的肾功能适用性(CrCl>60 mL/分钟)的公式在膀胱癌患者群体中的有效性尚未得到充分研究。我们假设这些公式可能会低估测量的CrCl,进而低估基于顺铂化疗的适用性。

患者与方法

回顾性研究了纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心(纽约,NY)1983年至1994年间按照方案接受基于顺铂化疗的208例不可切除或转移性膀胱癌患者的数据库。研究了测量的和计算的CrCl之间的关联以及完成三个周期(最小治疗量)化疗的能力。

结果

16%的患者基线测量的CrCl低于60 mL/分钟,而使用各种公式计算得出的比例为12%至44%。计算的CrCl与测量的CrCl低于60 mL/分钟之间的一致性较差(kappa值范围为0.14至0.38)。在65岁以上的患者中,22%测量的CrCl低于60 mL/分钟,而使用各种公式计算得出的比例为10%至63%。总体而言,8%完成了至少三个周期的基于顺铂的化疗。完成至少三个周期的能力与测量的CrCl高于60 mL/分钟在统计学上显著相关(P = 0.02),但与计算的CrCl高于60 mL/分钟无关。

结论

当前估算CrCl的公式往往会低估测量的CrCl,尤其是在65岁以上的人群中。根据所使用的公式,目前高达44%实际基于测量CrCl接受基于顺铂化疗的患者会被视为不符合条件,这可能会影响生存结果。应重新审视确定膀胱癌患者CrCl和/或基于顺铂化疗的肾脏适用性的方法。

相似文献

1
Formulas calculating creatinine clearance are inadequate for determining eligibility for Cisplatin-based chemotherapy in bladder cancer.计算肌酐清除率的公式不足以确定膀胱癌患者是否适合接受基于顺铂的化疗。
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jul 1;24(19):3095-100. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.3091.
2
Impact of renal impairment on eligibility for adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.肾功能损害对膀胱尿路上皮癌患者接受基于顺铂的辅助化疗资格的影响。
Cancer. 2006 Aug 1;107(3):506-13. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22031.
3
Impact of the CKD-EPI equation for estimating renal function on eligibility for cisplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with urothelial cancer.估算肾功能的 CKD-EPI 方程对接受含顺铂化疗的膀胱癌患者的适用性的影响。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2012 Mar;10(1):15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2011.10.004. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
4
The potential nephrotoxic effects of intensity modulated radiotherapy delivered to the para-aortic area of women with gynecologic malignancies: preliminary results.调强放疗对妇科恶性肿瘤女性患者腹主动脉旁区域的潜在肾毒性作用:初步结果
Am J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jun;29(3):281-9. doi: 10.1097/01.coc.0000217828.95729.b5.
5
Prognostic significance of adjuvant cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy following radical cystectomy in patients with invasive bladder cancer.浸润性膀胱癌患者根治性膀胱切除术后辅助铂类联合化疗的预后意义。
Int J Urol. 2008 Apr;15(4):314-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02000.x.
6
Cisplatin-based chemotherapy in renal transplant recipients. A case report and a review of the literature.
Cancer. 1996 Jan 1;77(1):160-3. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960101)77:1<160::AID-CNCR26>3.0.CO;2-2.
7
Calculated versus measured creatinine clearance for dosing methotrexate in the treatment of primary central nervous system lymphoma.在原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤治疗中,用于甲氨蝶呤给药的计算肌酐清除率与实测肌酐清除率的对比
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2007 May;59(6):817-23. doi: 10.1007/s00280-006-0339-x. Epub 2006 Sep 14.
8
A comparison of measured creatinine clearance versus calculated glomerular filtration rate for assessment of renal function before autologous and allogeneic BMT.自体和异基因骨髓移植前评估肾功能时实测肌酐清除率与计算肾小球滤过率的比较。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009 May;15(5):574-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.01.015.
9
Evaluation of chemotherapy with magnetic resonance imaging in patients with regionally metastatic or unresectable bladder cancer.磁共振成像评估局部转移性或不可切除膀胱癌患者的化疗效果。
Eur Urol. 2006 Apr;49(4):698-703. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.01.022. Epub 2006 Jan 31.
10
Novel algorithm for more accurate calculation of renal function in adults with cancer.用于更准确计算成年癌症患者肾功能的新算法。
Ann Pharmacother. 2008 Dec;42(12):1749-57. doi: 10.1345/aph.1L216. Epub 2008 Nov 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Cisplatin eligibility in the neoadjuvant setting of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy.顺铂在接受根治性膀胱切除术的肌层浸润性膀胱癌新辅助治疗中的适用性。
Oncologist. 2024 Nov 4;29(11):e1511-e1522. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae160.
2
Estimating kidney function in patients with cancer: A narrative review.评估癌症患者的肾功能:一项叙述性综述。
Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2023 Jun;238(2):e13977. doi: 10.1111/apha.13977. Epub 2023 Apr 30.
3
Improving Cancer Care for Patients With CKD: The Need for Changes in Clinical Trials.
改善慢性肾脏病患者的癌症护理:临床试验变革的必要性。
Kidney Int Rep. 2022 Jun 15;7(9):1939-1950. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.06.005. eCollection 2022 Sep.
4
Management of Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma in Older and Frail Patients: Have Novel Treatment Approaches Improved Their Care?老年及虚弱患者晚期尿路上皮癌的管理:新的治疗方法是否改善了他们的治疗效果?
Drugs Aging. 2022 Apr;39(4):271-284. doi: 10.1007/s40266-022-00933-2. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
5
Vinorelbine in bladder-preserving multimodality treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer-a valid option for cisplatin-unfit patients?长春瑞滨在保留膀胱的多模式治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌中的应用——对于不适合顺铂治疗的患者是一个有效的选择吗?
Strahlenther Onkol. 2022 Jan;198(1):25-32. doi: 10.1007/s00066-021-01837-7. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
6
Defining cisplatin eligibility in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.定义肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者使用顺铂的适应证。
Nat Rev Urol. 2021 Feb;18(2):104-114. doi: 10.1038/s41585-020-00404-6. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
7
Serum Cystatin C as a Potential Marker for Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients with Cholangiocarcinoma.血清胱抑素C作为胆管癌患者肾小球滤过率的潜在标志物。
Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res. 2020 Jul 1;14(3):157-166. doi: 10.18502/ijhoscr.v14i3.3723.
8
Nephrotoxicity in cancer treatment: An overview.癌症治疗中的肾毒性:概述
World J Clin Oncol. 2020 Apr 24;11(4):190-204. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i4.190.
9
Cockcroft-Gault, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease, and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equations for estimating glomerular filtration rates in cancer patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy.用于估算接受顺铂化疗的癌症患者肾小球滤过率的Cockcroft-Gault公式、肾脏病饮食改良公式和慢性肾脏病流行病学协作组公式。
Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2017 Dec;36(4):342-348. doi: 10.23876/j.krcp.2017.36.4.342. Epub 2017 Dec 31.
10
Urothelial carcinoma management in elderly or unfit patients.老年或身体状况不佳患者的尿路上皮癌管理
EJC Suppl. 2016 Mar;14(1):1-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcsup.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Mar 22.