Glaab T, Banik N, Trautmann M, Hellmann A, Wencker M
Medizinischer Fachbereich Pneumologie, München.
Pneumologie. 2006 Jul;60(7):395-400. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-932166.
Several evidenced-based clinical guidelines are available for COPD which is the most frequent chronic respiratory disease. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outpatient COPD management of pneumologists based on current national and international guidelines for the first time and to identify any deviations.
A nationwide prospective cross-sectional survey was performed as a multiple-choice questionnaire sent to 863 pneumologists in Germany. The product-neutral questions focused on the knowledge about, acceptance of and practical experience with current national and international COPD guidelines.
359 pneumologists (41.6 %) participated in the survey. 60.4 % of the participants preferred the GOLD guideline over the German COPD guideline (33.4 %). 54.3 % considered bodyplethysmography as the diagnostic standard, followed by spirometry (38.4 %). However, only about 80 % were able to cite the correct spirometric criteria for classifying COPD severity. It is remarkable that many physicians still oriented to the outdated GOLD classification of 2001. The two most important treatment goals cited were to improve quality of life (82.2 %) and prevent exacerbations (63 %). Except for the criteria for the use of steroids and the implementation of pulmonary rehabilitation measures, treatment of COPD based on severity class was largely in compliance with the guidelines. However, a significant percentage of the pneumologists incorrectly assessed the evidence-based clinical benefits of various therapeutic measures.
The results of this survey show that most pneumologists adhere to guideline recommendations in daily practice and prefer the GOLD over the national COPD guideline. However, deficiencies in guideline conformity still exist with regard to severity classification and treatment of COPD.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是最常见的慢性呼吸道疾病,有多项循证临床指南可供参考。本研究旨在首次根据当前国内外指南评估肺科医生对门诊COPD的管理情况,并找出任何偏差。
在德国对863名肺科医生进行了一项全国性前瞻性横断面调查,采用多项选择题问卷形式。与产品无关的问题集中在对当前国内外COPD指南的了解、接受程度和实践经验。
359名肺科医生(41.6%)参与了调查。60.4%的参与者更喜欢全球慢性阻塞性肺疾病倡议(GOLD)指南,而不是德国COPD指南(33.4%)。54.3%的人认为体容积描记法是诊断标准,其次是肺量计检查(38.4%)。然而,只有约80%的人能够说出用于COPD严重程度分类的正确肺量计标准。值得注意的是,许多医生仍然遵循2001年过时的GOLD分类法。提到的两个最重要的治疗目标是改善生活质量(82.2%)和预防病情加重(63%)。除了使用类固醇的标准和实施肺康复措施外,根据严重程度分级对COPD的治疗在很大程度上符合指南。然而,相当一部分肺科医生错误地评估了各种治疗措施的循证临床益处。
本次调查结果表明,大多数肺科医生在日常实践中遵循指南建议,并且更喜欢GOLD指南而非国家COPD指南。然而,在COPD的严重程度分类和治疗方面,仍存在与指南不符的情况。