J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Mar;12(2):191-9. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-191.
In pigeons responding under a 180-sec fixed-interval schedule of reinforcement, the frequency distribution of the duration of the final interresponse time before the reinforcer was compared with the distribution of the preceding two interresponse times. The results confirmed qualitatively and quantitatively the expected preferential reinforcement of longer interreinforcement times under fixed-interval reinforcement. Requirements at reinforcement were then changed to eliminate the preferential reinforcement of longer interresponse times. Local patterns and mean rate of responding could change, without the characteristic fixed-interval pattern of increasing responding through the interval (scalloping) being much affected. It is concluded that this characteristic pattern of fixed-interval responding does not depend crucially on effects of the reinforcer at the moment of reinforcement, but rather to effects extending over much longer periods of time than just the last interresponse time.
在鸽子根据 180 秒固定时距强化程序进行反应的过程中,比较了强化前最后一个间隔反应时间与前两个间隔反应时间的持续时间的频率分布。结果从定性和定量两个方面证实了固定时距强化中对较长的强化间隔时间的优先强化。然后改变强化的要求,以消除对较长间隔反应时间的优先强化。局部模式和平均反应率可能会发生变化,而不会对间隔时间内反应(破浪)的固定时距模式产生太大影响。结论是,这种固定时距反应的特征模式并不取决于强化时的强化作用,而是取决于比最后一个间隔反应时间长得多的时间内的强化作用。