J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 May;15(3):335-45. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-335.
Comparison was made of two methods for training monkeys to "observe" a two-member serial position sequence by pressing two consecutively lighted keys and then to "report" the sequence by pressing the same two keys in the same order but without the lights. A fading technique involving gradual elimination of brightness cues from "reporting" keys was found more effective than a no-fading procedure in which the cues remained bright during training and then were suddenly removed. Animals that failed to learn to report a new sequence with the no-fading procedure sometimes developed behavior incompatible with that desired. They made repeated and specific errors that prematurely terminated trials of the sequence to-be-learned, even though the correct key was cued by a bright light. They behaved appropriately, however, on succeeding trials of other sequences. Thus, the errors were followed by trials on which reinforcement occurred. Manipulation of this contingency indicated its importance in maintaining the stereotyped error patterns.
比较了两种训练猴子通过按下两个连续点亮的键来“观察”两个成员的连续位置序列,然后通过按下相同的两个键但没有灯光来“报告”序列的方法。发现渐消技术(涉及逐渐消除“报告”键的亮度提示)比无渐消程序更有效,在无渐消程序中,提示在训练期间保持明亮,然后突然消失。未能通过无渐消程序学习报告新序列的动物有时会表现出与所需行为不兼容的行为。它们会重复并出现特定的错误,过早地终止要学习的序列的试验,尽管正确的键由亮光提示。然而,它们在随后的其他序列的试验中表现得恰当。因此,错误之后是出现强化的试验。这种偶然事件的操纵表明了它在维持刻板的错误模式中的重要性。