University of Canterbury, Department of Psychology, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 Jan;95(1):1-20. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2011.95-1.
In the present study we extended errorless learning to a conditional temporal discrimination. Pigeons' responses to a left-red key after a 2-s sample and to a right-green key after a 10-s sample were reinforced. There were two groups: One learned the discrimination through trial and error and the other through an errorless learning procedure. Then, both groups were presented with three types of tests. First, they were exposed to intermediate durations between 2 s and 10 s, and given a choice between both keys (stimulus generalization test). Second, a delay from 1 s to 16 s was included between the offset of the sample and the onset of the choice keys (delay test). Finally, pigeons learned a new discrimination in which the stimuli were switched (reversal test). Results showed that pigeons from the Errorless group made significantly fewer errors than those in the Trial-and-Error group. Both groups performed similarly during the stimulus generalization test and the reversal test, but results of the delay test suggested that, on long stimulus trials, responding in the errorless training group was less disrupted by delays.
在本研究中,我们将无误学习扩展到条件时间辨别任务中。当 2 秒的样本后,鸽子对左红键做出反应,而当 10 秒的样本后,鸽子对右绿键做出反应,这两种反应都会得到强化。有两组鸽子参与了实验:一组通过试错法学习辨别任务,另一组通过无误学习程序学习。然后,两组鸽子都接受了三种类型的测试。首先,它们接触到了 2 秒到 10 秒之间的中间时间,并在两个键之间做出选择(刺激泛化测试)。其次,在样本结束和选择键出现之间插入了从 1 秒到 16 秒的延迟(延迟测试)。最后,鸽子学习了一种新的辨别任务,其中刺激被切换(反转测试)。结果表明,无误组的鸽子比试错组的鸽子犯的错误明显少。两组鸽子在刺激泛化测试和反转测试中的表现相似,但延迟测试的结果表明,在长刺激试验中,无误训练组的反应受延迟的干扰较小。