J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 May;25(3):377-87. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-377.
Pigeons' pecks on two keys were maintained, without changeover delays, by independent variable-interval schedules of food reinforcement. Four regularly cycling 2-min components scheduled reinforcement respectively for both keys, left key only, both keys, and right key only. Initially, reinforcement scheduled for one key alone produced more responding on that key than reinforcement scheduled concurrently for both keys. Continued sessions reduced this difference; response rate on a given key approached constancy, or invariance with respect to the performance on and schedule for the other key. When extinction replaced the reinforcement schedule on either key, responding on that key decreased more during components that scheduled reinforcement for the other key than during those that did not. This demonstration that responses on one key were not supported by reinforcers on the other key suggested that the alternation of concurrent responding and either-key-alone responding prevented concurrent superstitions from developing.
鸽子啄两个键,啄左边键和啄右边键的反应,分别由独立的变时距强化程序控制,啄两个键的反应则由四个循环的 2 分钟成分程序控制,各成分程序分别强化啄两个键、啄左边键、啄两个键和啄右边键。起初,单独强化某一键的程序比同时强化两键的程序产生较多的啄该键反应。继续实验,这种差异逐渐减少;对某一键的反应率逐渐接近稳定,即不因另一键的操作和程序而变化。当任一键的强化程序被消光取代后,在强化另一键的成分期间,该键的反应比不强化另一键的成分期间减少得更多。这个实验表明,对一键的反应不是由另一键的强化所支持的,这提示我们:啄两键和啄一键的交替,防止了同时出现的迷信行为。