J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 May;27(3):479-94. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-479.
Three experiments investigated the reinforcing value of access to a safe place during timeout from an avoidance schedule. Rats were trained on conjoint schedules in which responding both postponed shock on a free-operant avoidance schedule and produced periods of timeout on fixed-ratio schedules. In some conditions, a shelf was inserted into the operant chamber during timeout, enabling subjects to get off the grid floor. The combination of timeout and shelf maintained substantially higher response rates than the baseline avoidance schedule with ratio requirements as high as 90 (Experiment I). Adding the shelf to timeouts in one component of multiple fixed-ratio schedules of timeout resulted in higher response rates in the component where the shelf was included (Experiment II). When timeouts with and without the shelf were arranged on concurrent schedules, the shelf-timeout combination was preferred, even when of shorter duration than timeout alone (Experiment III). In all three experiments, subjects climbed on the shelf, although all shocks were cancelled during timeout periods. The results could not be accounted for solely in terms of the reinforcing properties of changes in shock rates, but required an interpretation that ascribed conditioned reinforcing value to stimuli associated with such changes.
三项实验研究了在逃避计划中获得安全场所的强化价值。老鼠在联合时间表上接受训练,在自由操作逃避计划中反应既可以推迟电击,又可以在固定比率时间表上产生超时。在某些条件下,架子会在超时期间插入操作室,使受试者可以离开网格地板。与比率要求高达 90 的基线逃避计划相比,超时和架子的组合保持了更高的反应率(实验 I)。在多个固定比率时间表的一个组成部分中添加架子到超时中,导致包含架子的组成部分中的反应率更高(实验 II)。当有和没有架子的超时安排在并发时间表上时,即使架子超时的持续时间比单独超时短,架子超时的组合也是首选(实验 III)。在所有三个实验中,尽管在超时期间所有电击都被取消,但老鼠会爬上架子。这些结果不能仅根据电击率变化的强化特性来解释,而是需要一种解释,即将与这种变化相关的刺激归因于条件强化价值。