Suppr超能文献

三人程控环境中配对偶联对行为的影响。

Effects of a pairing contingency on behavior in a three-person programmed environment.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Mar;29(2):319-29. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-319.

Abstract

Four groups of three subjects resided for 10 days within a continuously programmed environment. Subjects followed a behavioral program of contingently scheduled activities that determined individual and social behaviors. A triadic condition was in effect when all three subjects were required to select simultaneous access to a group area before it became available for a social episode. A dyadic condition was in effect when access to a group area was permitted to any combination of two, and only two, subjects. The effects of these two conditions on individual and social behaviors were studied in reversal designs with several successive days devoted to each condition. Results showed that durations of social activities and synchronization of individual activities were greater during triadic conditions than during dyadic conditions. Under both conditions, wake-sleep cycles departed from a typical day-night rhythm for most subjects. Instances when subjects did not respond to each others' attempts to initiate conversations using the intercom were generally more frequent during dyadic than triadic conditions. Physical distance during triadic social episodes was found to be related to sociability levels during dyadic conditions.

摘要

四组三名受试者在一个连续编程的环境中居住了 10 天。受试者遵循一个行为程序,该程序根据个人和社会行为进行有条件的安排。当所有三名受试者都需要选择同时进入一个小组区域才能进行社交活动时,就会出现三人条件。当允许两名或两名以下受试者组合进入小组区域时,就会出现两人条件。这两种条件对个人和社会行为的影响在几个连续的日子里通过反转设计进行了研究。结果表明,在三人条件下,社交活动的持续时间和个人活动的同步性大于两人条件。在这两种条件下,大多数受试者的清醒-睡眠周期都偏离了典型的昼夜节律。当受试者没有通过对讲机回应彼此的对话请求时,这种情况在两人条件下比三人条件下更为频繁。在三人社交活动期间,身体距离与两人条件下的社交能力水平有关。

相似文献

1
Effects of a pairing contingency on behavior in a three-person programmed environment.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Mar;29(2):319-29. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-319.
2
The effects of a cooperation contingency on behavior in a continuous three-person environment.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 May;25(3):293-302. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-293.
3
Dyadic and triadic skills in preterm and full term infants: a longitudinal study in the first year.
Infant Behav Dev. 2011 Feb;34(1):179-88. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2010.12.007. Epub 2010 Dec 24.
4
Positive and negative reinforcement effects on behavior in a three-person microsociety.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Sep;44(2):157-74. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-157.
6
Dyadic interactions, attachment and the presence of triadic interactions in chimpanzees and humans.
Infant Behav Dev. 2017 Aug;48(Pt A):13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2016.11.002. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
8
The second person in "I"-"you"-"it" triadic interactions.
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Aug;36(4):416-7. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12001860.

引用本文的文献

1
What We Know About Team Dynamics for Long-Distance Space Missions: A Systematic Review of Analog Research.
Front Psychol. 2019 May 15;10:811. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00811. eCollection 2019.
2
Positive and negative reinforcement effects on behavior in a three-person microsociety.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Sep;44(2):157-74. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-157.
3
Behavior analysis of cigarette smoking.
Pavlov J Biol Sci. 1982 Jul-Sep;17(3):140-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03001208.
4
Small groups in programmed environments. Behavioral and biological interactions.
Pavlov J Biol Sci. 1983 Oct-Dec;18(4):199-210. doi: 10.1007/BF03019353.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验