J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Mar;39(2):309-22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-309.
Pigeons were exposed to fixed-time schedules of food presentation ranging from five to 300 seconds. Although consistent, stereotyped response patterns developed during interfood intervals on all schedules, there were distinct differences in the behavior observed on schedules with short, as opposed to long, intervals. During the shorter intervals, responses were performed quite vigorously, a feeder-directed terminal response was observed, and most activities were localized near the feeder. On the longer schedules, no feeder-directed terminal response developed, although the birds were usually near the feeder at the end of intervals. The predominant response involved moving about the chamber, often pacing along one of the walls. Performance during short intervals is accounted for quite well by the antagonistic-motivational state hypothesis suggested by Staddon (1977); however, performance during longer intervals is not. Behavior during interfood intervals may more accurately be classified as reflecting a single (food) motivational state and described simply in terms of Craig's (1918) appetitive behavior.
鸽子被暴露于从 5 秒到 300 秒的固定时距食物呈现程序中。尽管在所有的时距程序中,在食物间隔期间形成了一致的、刻板的反应模式,但在观察短间隔和长间隔时距程序时,观察到的行为存在明显的差异。在较短的间隔期间,反应非常有力地进行,观察到朝向喂食器的终末反应,并且大多数活动都集中在喂食器附近。在较长的时距程序中,虽然在间隔结束时鸟通常在喂食器附近,但没有朝向喂食器的终末反应发展。占主导地位的反应是在室内四处移动,通常沿着其中一堵墙踱步。由 Staddon(1977)提出的拮抗动机状态假说可以很好地解释短间隔期间的表现;然而,长间隔期间的表现则不能。食物间隔期间的行为更准确地反映了单一的(食物)动机状态,可以简单地用 Craig(1918)的欲望行为来描述。