Suppr超能文献

在非应答依赖型食物强化程序下对白王鸽的发作及饮水情况进行评估。

Assessment of attack and drinking in White King pigeons on response-independent food schedules.

作者信息

Yoburn B C, Cohen P S

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Jan;31(1):91-101. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.31-91.

Abstract

Four White King pigeons in Experiment I were exposed to a fixed-time 90-second food schedule with successive access to water and a conspecific target. Drinking per session was sporadic and minimal, while attack per session occurred during most interfood intervals for all animals. Analysis of the temporal distribution of attack showed that the typical postreinforcement pattern of attack developed over the course of the experiment. In Experiment II, the same animals were exposed to a series of fixed-time schedules ranging from 30 to 360 seconds with successive access to water and target. Time engaged in drinking and the number of interfood intervals with drinking were less than that of attack. Food and no-food baselines, which have been typically used to assess schedules-induced drinking and attack, respectively, were used to evaluate the effect of the schedule on attack and water ingestion. Relative to the no-food baseline, both attack and drinking were enhanced by the schedule in all birds. Relative to the food baseline, drinking was slightly suppressed in three birds and attack was enhanced in all. For all animals, the food baseline resulted in more attack and drinking than the no-food baseline.

摘要

实验一中的四只白王鸽被设定为固定时间的90秒进食时间表,依次给予水和同种目标物。每次实验中的饮水行为零散且量少,而所有动物在大多数进食间隔期间都会出现攻击行为。对攻击行为的时间分布分析表明,典型的强化后攻击模式在实验过程中逐渐形成。在实验二中,同样的动物被设定为一系列从30秒到360秒的固定时间时间表,依次给予水和目标物。饮水时间和有饮水行为的进食间隔次数均少于攻击行为。通常分别用于评估时间表诱导的饮水和攻击行为的进食基线和无进食基线,被用来评估时间表对攻击行为和水摄入的影响。相对于无进食基线,所有鸟类的攻击行为和饮水行为都因时间表而增强。相对于进食基线,三只鸟的饮水行为略有抑制,而所有鸟的攻击行为均增强。对于所有动物,进食基线导致的攻击行为和饮水行为比无进食基线更多。

相似文献

10
Temporal patterns of reinforcer-induced general activity and attack in pigeons.
Physiol Behav. 1986;37(4):577-82. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(86)90289-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Avian Emotions: Comparative Perspectives on Fear and Frustration.鸟类的情感:恐惧与挫败的比较视角
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 17;9:2707. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02707. eCollection 2018.
2
Thirst-drinking, hunger-eating; tight coupling?口渴饮水,饥饿进食;紧密耦合?
J Am Diet Assoc. 2009 Mar;109(3):486-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.11.027.

本文引用的文献

4
Schedule-induced mirror responding in the pigeon.鸽子的诱发镜像反应。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 May;19(3):395-408. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-395.
7
Extinction-induced aggression.灭绝诱发的侵略性。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 May;9(3):191-204. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-191.
8
INTERACTION OF HUNGER AND THIRST IN THE BARBARY DOVE.巴巴里鸽饥饿与口渴的相互作用
J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1964 Oct;58:174-9. doi: 10.1037/h0046950.
9
The interaction of hunger and thirst in the rat.大鼠饥饿与口渴的相互作用。
J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1961 Oct;54:580-4. doi: 10.1037/h0044595.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验