J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Sep;44(2):175-84. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-175.
Five children, ranging in age from 3(1/2) years to 5(1/2) years, were taught various four-response chains using conditioned reinforcement. Experiment 1 investigated the effects of presenting "instruction" stimuli-a sequence of lights over the correct response buttons-to assess their role in facilitating the acquisition of a chain of responses. Without the "instruction" stimuli, children made many errors before responses were brought under the control of the programmed contingencies. When confronted with the same contingencies later in the day, these subjects made fewer errors. In contrast, in the presence of the "instruction" stimuli, subjects made virtually no errors. However, when the "instruction" stimuli were discontinued in the subsequent session, all 5 subjects made errors. In Experiment 2, the subjects were taught to verbalize the contingencies during the phase without the "instruction" stimuli. This resulted in errorless performance during the subsequent exposure to the same procedure, but errors nevertheless occurred again during reexposure to the procedure with the "instruction" stimuli discontinued.
五个年龄在 3(1/2)岁到 5(1/2)岁之间的孩子,使用条件强化来学习各种四反应链。实验 1 研究了呈现“指令”刺激(一系列灯光在正确的反应按钮上)的效果,以评估它们在促进反应链习得中的作用。没有“指令”刺激,孩子们在反应受到程序约束之前会犯很多错误。当天晚些时候面对相同的约束时,这些被试犯的错误更少。相比之下,在存在“指令”刺激的情况下,被试几乎没有犯任何错误。然而,当在随后的会议中停止使用“指令”刺激时,所有 5 名被试都犯了错误。在实验 2 中,要求被试在没有“指令”刺激的阶段口头表达约束条件。这导致在随后暴露于相同程序时表现出无错误,但在再次暴露于没有停止使用“指令”刺激的程序时,仍会再次出错。