• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估外科医生在颈动脉内膜切除术之前对风险信息的披露情况。

Assessing surgeons' disclosure of risk information before carotid endarterectomy.

作者信息

Middleton Sandy, Gattellari Melina, Harris John P, Ward Jeanette E

机构信息

School of Nursing (NSW), ACU National, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2006 Jul;76(7):618-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03788.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03788.x
PMID:16813629
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To make an informed decision about treatment, patients need accurate information about the benefits and risks of treatment and 'non-treatment' options. A survey was conducted to determine patients' recall of the extent and effect of preoperative disclosure by surgeons to patients of risks about carotid endarterectomy (CEA).

METHODS

A self-administered questionnaire was given to 133 patients undergoing elective CEA in New South Wales. The primary outcome measures were patient recall of preoperative discussion, self-assessed estimates of stroke risk with and without surgery and receipt of written information before CEA.

RESULTS

A significantly higher proportion of patients recalled that their surgeon discussed the short-term stroke risk (i.e. within 30 days) if they decided to undergo CEA (86.2%) than if they decided not to have the procedure (76.9%) (P = 0.04). Of those patients who recalled the surgeon discussing their short-term stroke risk with CEA, only 24 (18.0%) were accurately able to quantify this risk. Patients were significantly more likely to recall their surgeon discussing their long-term stroke risk (i.e. within 2 years) if they decided not to have CEA (72.4%) than if they decided to have the CEA (31.5%) (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients recalled discussions with their surgeon about short-term stroke risk. Only a minority, however, accurately quantified their postoperative stroke risk. In view of variable patient recall, decision aids could assist.

摘要

背景

为了对治疗做出明智的决定,患者需要了解有关治疗以及“不治疗”选择的益处和风险的准确信息。开展了一项调查,以确定患者对外科医生向其披露颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)风险的程度和效果的记忆情况。

方法

对新南威尔士州133例行择期CEA的患者发放了一份自填式问卷。主要观察指标包括患者对术前讨论的记忆、对手术和不手术情况下中风风险的自我评估以及CEA术前是否收到书面信息。

结果

与决定不接受该手术的患者(76.9%)相比,决定接受CEA的患者中,回忆起外科医生讨论过短期(即30天内)中风风险的比例显著更高(86.2%)(P = 0.04)。在那些回忆起外科医生讨论过CEA短期中风风险的患者中,只有24人(18.0%)能够准确量化这一风险。与决定接受CEA的患者(31.5%)相比,决定不接受CEA的患者回忆起外科医生讨论过长期(即2年内)中风风险的可能性显著更高(72.4%)(P < 0.0001)。

结论

患者回忆起与外科医生讨论过短期中风风险。然而,只有少数患者准确量化了术后中风风险。鉴于患者的回忆情况各不相同,决策辅助工具可能会有所帮助。

相似文献

1
Assessing surgeons' disclosure of risk information before carotid endarterectomy.评估外科医生在颈动脉内膜切除术之前对风险信息的披露情况。
ANZ J Surg. 2006 Jul;76(7):618-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03788.x.
2
Carotid-subclavian arterial reconstruction: concomitant ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy increases risk of perioperative stroke.颈动脉-锁骨下动脉重建术:同期进行同侧颈动脉内膜切除术会增加围手术期卒中风险。
Surgery. 2007 Sep;142(3):393-7. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.03.014.
3
Predicting medical and surgical complications of carotid endarterectomy: comparing the risk indexes.预测颈动脉内膜切除术的内科及外科并发症:风险指数比较
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Apr 24;166(8):914-20. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.8.914.
4
Carotid endarterectomy as the criterion standard in high-risk elderly patients.颈动脉内膜切除术作为高危老年患者的标准治疗方法。
Arch Surg. 2008 Aug;143(8):736-42; discussion 742. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.8.736.
5
Has evidence changed practice?: appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy after the clinical trials.证据是否改变了实践?:临床试验后颈动脉内膜切除术的适宜性
Neurology. 2007 Jan 16;68(3):187-94. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000251197.98197.e9.
6
Safety of carotid endarterectomy in patients concurrently on clopidogrel.同时服用氯吡格雷的患者行颈动脉内膜切除术的安全性
Ann Vasc Surg. 2009 Sep-Oct;23(5):612-5. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2009.06.004.
7
Wake-up test after carotid endarterectomy for combined carotid-coronary artery surgery: a case series.颈动脉内膜切除术联合颈动脉-冠状动脉手术术后唤醒试验:病例系列
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007 Aug;21(4):540-6. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2006.10.006. Epub 2007 Jan 25.
8
Nursing intervention after carotid endarterectomy: a randomized trial of Co-ordinated Care Post-Discharge (CCPD).颈动脉内膜切除术后的护理干预:出院后协调护理(CCPD)的随机试验
J Adv Nurs. 2005 Nov;52(3):250-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03587.x.
9
Simultaneous carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass grafting: results in specific patient groups.同期颈动脉内膜切除术与冠状动脉搭桥术:特定患者群体的结果
Ann Vasc Surg. 2007 Jul;21(4):408-14. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2006.12.007. Epub 2007 May 14.
10
Factors associated with a provider's recommendation of carotid endarterectomy: implications for understanding disparities in the use of invasive procedures.与医疗服务提供者推荐颈动脉内膜切除术相关的因素:对理解侵入性手术使用差异的启示
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Jan;45(1):124-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.09.014.

引用本文的文献

1
Translation and Validation of the Malay Doctor-Patient Communication Questionnaire: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Patients Receiving Hemodialysis in Kelantan, Malaysia.马来语医患沟通问卷的翻译与验证:马来西亚吉兰丹州接受血液透析患者的横断面研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 18;13(16):2037. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13162037.
2
Cardiovascular surgery experience does not significantly improve patients' response to stroke.心血管手术经验并不能显著改善患者对中风的反应。
Brain Behav. 2019 Oct;9(10):e01405. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1405. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
3
Effective communication, the heart of the art of medicine.
有效沟通是医学艺术的核心。
Lung India. 2017 Jan-Feb;34(1):95-96. doi: 10.4103/0970-2113.197122.
4
The use of formal and informal knowledge sources in patients' treatment decisions in secondary stroke prevention: qualitative study.在二级卒中预防中,患者在治疗决策中使用正式和非正式知识源:定性研究。
Health Expect. 2013 Sep;16(3):e13-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00724.x. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
5
Doctor-patient communication: a review.医患沟通:综述
Ochsner J. 2010 Spring;10(1):38-43.