Suppr超能文献

康复地点对社区居住的髋关节骨折患者6个月随访时恢复情况的影响。

Influence of rehabilitation site on hip fracture recovery in community-dwelling subjects at 6-month follow-up.

作者信息

Munin Michael C, Begley Amy, Skidmore Elizabeth R, Lenze Eric J

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Jul;87(7):1004-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.04.002.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether postacute rehabilitation after hip fracture influences recovery of prefracture function as detected by the FIM instrument motor scale.

DESIGN

Inception cohort.

SETTING

University-affiliated tertiary care hospital; inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) or skilled nursing facilities (SNFs).

PARTICIPANTS

People with acute proximal femur fracture treated between March 1, 2002, and June 30, 2003.

INTERVENTION

Post-hip fracture rehabilitation delivered at an IRF or SNF.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

FIM motor score estimated prefracture and obtained at 2 weeks and 24 weeks after hospital discharge.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients were treated at an IRF, whereas 39 were treated at an SNF. Controlling for baseline covariates, a mixed model showed a significant group by time interaction (F(3,57.1)=14.27, P < .001). Contrasts indicated that IRF subjects had greater initial improvement. Multiple logistic regression examining factors associated with recovery of FIM motor score to 95% or more of prefracture FIM motor score by 24 weeks found that IRF setting only was associated with recovery of baseline function with odds ratio of 5.44 (95% confidence interval, 2.02-14.65).

CONCLUSIONS

Even when controlling for important baseline covariates, community-dwelling hip fracture subjects treated in an IRF are more likely to attain 95% or more of prefracture functional status by 24 weeks postdischarge than subjects treated in an SNF.

摘要

目的

评估髋部骨折后急性康复是否会影响通过FIM仪器运动量表检测到的骨折前功能恢复情况。

设计

起始队列研究。

地点

大学附属三级护理医院;住院康复设施(IRF)或熟练护理设施(SNF)。

参与者

2002年3月1日至2003年6月30日期间接受急性股骨近端骨折治疗的患者。

干预措施

在IRF或SNF进行髋部骨折后康复治疗。

主要观察指标

出院后2周和24周时估计的骨折前FIM运动评分以及实际获得的评分。

结果

58例患者在IRF接受治疗,而另有39例在SNF接受治疗。在控制基线协变量后,混合模型显示出显著的组间时间交互作用(F(3,57.1)=14.27,P <.001)。对比表明,IRF组患者的初始改善更大。多项逻辑回归分析了与24周时FIM运动评分恢复到骨折前FIM运动评分的95%或更高相关的因素,发现只有IRF治疗环境与基线功能恢复相关,优势比为5.44(95%置信区间,2.02 - 14.65)。

结论

即使控制了重要的基线协变量,与在SNF接受治疗的患者相比,在IRF接受治疗的社区居住髋部骨折患者在出院后24周时更有可能达到骨折前功能状态的95%或更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验