Suppr超能文献

康复地点对髋部骨折后功能恢复的影响。

Effect of rehabilitation site on functional recovery after hip fracture.

作者信息

Munin Michael C, Seligman Karen, Dew Mary Amanda, Quear Tanya, Skidmore Elizabeth R, Gruen Gary, Reynolds Charles F, Lenze Eric J

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Mar;86(3):367-72. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.10.004.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether FIM instrument motor outcomes differ between hip fracture survivors undergoing rehabilitation in inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) and skilled nursing facilities (SNFs).

DESIGN

Inception cohort with follow-up to 12 weeks after hospital discharge.

SETTING

University-affiliated tertiary care hospital, IRFs, and SNFs.

PARTICIPANTS

All hip fracture patients prospectively admitted between March 1, 2002, and June 30, 2003, were eligible if they were 60 years or older and had surgical stabilization of the fracture.

INTERVENTIONS

Posthip fracture rehabilitation delivered at either IRFs or SNFs.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

FIM motor score obtained postoperatively and at 2 and 12 weeks posthospital discharge.

RESULTS

IRF patients stayed an average of 12.8 days, whereas SNF patients averaged 36.2 days. Rehabilitation participation scores were obtained during therapy sessions and did not differ between groups. A repeated-measures analysis of covariance found a significant group by time interaction (F 2,68 =23.75, P <.001), which indicates that patients in an IRF had significantly higher FIM motor scores than those in an SNF across time. Logistic regression showed that IRF subjects were more likely to reach 95% of their prefracture FIM motor by week 12 than were SNF patients. A significantly higher percentage of IRF patients were discharged home after rehabilitation compared with SNF patients.

CONCLUSIONS

IRF patients had superior 12-week functional outcomes, as measured by the FIM motor score, compared with those treated in an SNF. The improved outcomes occurred during a significantly shorter rehabilitation length of stay and remained even when statistically controlling for baseline differences between groups. These data suggest that hip fracture survivors should not be excluded from receiving inpatient rehabilitation services. Randomized clinical trials are needed to understand more fully differences between rehabilitation treatment settings.

摘要

目的

评估在住院康复机构(IRF)和专业护理机构(SNF)接受康复治疗的髋部骨折幸存者之间,功能独立性测量(FIM)工具的运动结果是否存在差异。

设计

起始队列研究,随访至出院后12周。

地点

大学附属三级护理医院、IRF和SNF。

参与者

2002年3月1日至2003年6月30日期间前瞻性收治的所有髋部骨折患者,年龄在60岁及以上且骨折接受手术固定者符合条件。

干预措施

在IRF或SNF进行髋部骨折后康复治疗。

主要观察指标

术后及出院后2周和12周获得的FIM运动评分。

结果

IRF患者平均住院12.8天,而SNF患者平均住院36.2天。在治疗期间获得康复参与评分,两组之间无差异。重复测量协方差分析发现,组间存在显著的时间交互作用(F 2,68 =23.75,P <.001),这表明在整个时间段内,IRF患者的FIM运动评分显著高于SNF患者。逻辑回归显示,与SNF患者相比,IRF受试者在第12周时更有可能达到其骨折前FIM运动评分的95%。与SNF患者相比,康复后出院回家的IRF患者比例显著更高。

结论

以FIM运动评分为衡量标准,IRF患者在12周时的功能结局优于在SNF接受治疗的患者。改善的结局出现在显著更短的康复住院时间内,即使在对组间基线差异进行统计学控制时仍然存在。这些数据表明,髋部骨折幸存者不应被排除在接受住院康复服务之外。需要进行随机临床试验以更全面地了解康复治疗环境之间的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验