Knight Elizabeth Dawes, Smith Jamie B, Dubowitz Howard, Litrownik Alan J, Kotch Jonathan B, English Diana, Everson Mark D, Runyan Desmond K
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill's Injury Prevention Research Center, USA.
Child Maltreat. 2006 Aug;11(3):257-62. doi: 10.1177/1077559505285786.
This study examines the impact of Child Protective Services (CPS) reports made by research study staff on participant retention and discusses human subjects protocols that may minimize either the need to make such reports or the negative impact of reporting on participants and on participant retention. Among 1, 354 primary caregiver-child pairs in the Longitudinal Studies of Child Abuse and Neglect (LONGSCAN) studies, a total of 15 were reported to CPS by study staff. Within this group, rates of study-generated reports and study participation subsequent to having been reported by researchers were examined. There was an overall retention rate of 93% across a minimum of three interview waves in this sample. Reporting research participants to CPS may have little impact on attrition.
本研究考察了研究人员提交的儿童保护服务(CPS)报告对参与者留存率的影响,并探讨了可能将此类报告需求降至最低或报告对参与者及参与者留存率负面影响降至最低的人体受试者方案。在虐待与忽视儿童纵向研究(LONGSCAN)中的1354对主要照料者-儿童组合中,研究人员共向CPS报告了15例。在该组中,研究人员报告后所产生的报告率及研究参与情况得到了考察。此样本在至少三轮访谈中的总体留存率为93%。向CPS报告研究参与者可能对损耗影响甚微。