van Zanten Sander Veldhuyzen, Armstrong David, Chiba Naoki, Flook Nigel, White Robert J, Chakraborty Bijan, Gasco Ally
Division of Gastroenterology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Sep;101(9):2096-106. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00751.x. Epub 2006 Jun 30.
OBJECTIVE: The etiologies of functional dyspepsia (FD) are unclear, but in some studies, treatment with a proton pump inhibitor has been beneficial. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of esomeprazole 40 mg once a day compared to placebo in achieving symptom relief in primary care patients with FD. METHODS: This was a randomized, placebo-controlled trial in adult FD patients, who had at least moderate severity of symptoms, defined as a score of > or =4 on a 7-point Global Overall Symptom (GOS) scale. Patients were excluded if they had predominant symptoms of heartburn or regurgitation; after a normal baseline endoscopy, patients were randomized to esomeprazole 40 mg once daily or placebo for 8 wk. The primary outcome measure was symptom relief (GOS < or =2) at 8 wk. RESULTS: Of the 502 enrolled patients, 224 were randomized. The main reasons for exclusion were abnormal endoscopic findings, especially esophagitis. A significantly greater proportion of patients in the esomeprazole group achieved symptom relief at 4 but not at 8 wk compared to placebo: 4 wk esomeprazole 50.5% versus placebo 32.2%, p= 0.009; 8 wk esomeprazole 55.1% versus placebo 46.1%, p= 0.16. A similar relationship at 4 and 8 wk was seen for symptom resolution (GOS = 1) and improvement (DeltaGOS > or =2). CONCLUSION: For the primary outcome measure of symptom relief at 8 wk, there was no statistically significant difference between esomeprazole 40 mg once a day and placebo. However, at 4 wk, esomeprazole was significantly more effective than placebo for symptom relief. The difference in therapeutic gain between 4 and 8 wk was largely due to a higher placebo response rate at 8 wk.
目的:功能性消化不良(FD)的病因尚不清楚,但在一些研究中,质子泵抑制剂治疗已显示出益处。本研究的目的是评估与安慰剂相比,每天一次服用40毫克埃索美拉唑对初级保健FD患者缓解症状的疗效。 方法:这是一项针对成年FD患者的随机、安慰剂对照试验,这些患者症状至少为中度,定义为在7分的全球总体症状(GOS)量表上得分≥4分。如果患者主要症状为烧心或反流,则被排除;在基线内镜检查正常后,患者被随机分为每天一次服用40毫克埃索美拉唑或安慰剂,为期8周。主要结局指标是8周时症状缓解(GOS≤2)。 结果:在502名入组患者中,224名被随机分组。排除的主要原因是内镜检查结果异常,尤其是食管炎。与安慰剂相比,埃索美拉唑组在4周而非8周时症状缓解的患者比例显著更高:4周时埃索美拉唑组为50.5%,安慰剂组为32.2%,p = 0.009;8周时埃索美拉唑组为55.1%,安慰剂组为46.1%,p = 0.16。在4周和8周时,症状消失(GOS = 1)和改善(ΔGOS≥2)也呈现类似关系。 结论:对于8周时症状缓解的主要结局指标,每天一次服用40毫克埃索美拉唑与安慰剂之间无统计学显著差异。然而,在4周时,埃索美拉唑在缓解症状方面显著优于安慰剂。4周和8周之间治疗获益的差异主要归因于8周时安慰剂反应率较高。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2002-3
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023-2
BMC Gastroenterol. 2021-11-25
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020-4-30
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020-1-30
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-11-21