Suppr超能文献

兰索拉唑治疗功能性消化不良:两项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。

Lansoprazole in the treatment of functional dyspepsia: two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials.

作者信息

Peura David A, Kovacs Thomas O G, Metz David C, Siepman Nancy, Pilmer Betsy L, Talley Nicholas J

机构信息

University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.

出版信息

Am J Med. 2004 Jun 1;116(11):740-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.01.008.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The efficacy of proton pump inhibitor therapy for symptom resolution in patients with functional dyspepsia remains controversial. This study was designed to compare the efficacy of lansoprazole with placebo in relieving upper abdominal discomfort in patients with functional dyspepsia.

METHODS

We enrolled 921 patients with functional dyspepsia (defined as persistent or recurrent upper abdominal discomfort during the prior 3 months) and moderate upper abdominal discomfort on at least 30% of screening days; none of the patients had predominant symptoms suggestive of gastroesophageal reflux or endoscopic evidence of erosive or ulcerative esophagitis, or gastric or duodenal ulcer or erosion. Patients were assigned randomly to receive lansoprazole 15 mg (n = 305), lansoprazole 30 mg (n = 308), or placebo (n = 308) daily for 8 weeks. Patients recorded the frequency and severity of symptoms in daily diaries.

RESULTS

At week 8, significantly (P <0.001) greater mean reductions in the percentage of days with upper abdominal discomfort were reported in patients treated with lansoprazole 15 mg (35%) or 30 mg (34%) compared with those treated with placebo (19%). Similarly, more patients treated with lansoprazole 15 mg (44%) or 30 mg (44%) reported complete symptom resolution (defined as no episodes of upper abdominal discomfort in the 3 days before the study visit) at 8 weeks than did placebo-treated patients (29%, P <0.001). Improvement of upper abdominal discomfort, however, was seen only in patients who had at least some symptoms of heartburn at enrollment.

CONCLUSION

Lansoprazole, at a daily dose of 15 mg or 30 mg, is significantly better than placebo in reducing symptoms of persistent or recurrent upper abdominal discomfort accompanied by at least some symptoms of heartburn.

摘要

目的

质子泵抑制剂治疗功能性消化不良患者症状缓解的疗效仍存在争议。本研究旨在比较兰索拉唑与安慰剂缓解功能性消化不良患者上腹部不适的疗效。

方法

我们纳入了921例功能性消化不良患者(定义为在之前3个月内持续或反复出现上腹部不适),且在至少30%的筛查日有中度上腹部不适;所有患者均无提示胃食管反流的主要症状,也无糜烂性或溃疡性食管炎、胃或十二指肠溃疡或糜烂的内镜证据。患者被随机分配,每天接受15毫克兰索拉唑(n = 305)、30毫克兰索拉唑(n = 308)或安慰剂(n = 308)治疗,为期8周。患者在日常日记中记录症状的频率和严重程度。

结果

在第8周时,与接受安慰剂治疗的患者(19%)相比,接受15毫克(35%)或30毫克(34%)兰索拉唑治疗的患者报告的上腹部不适天数的平均减少百分比显著更大(P <0.001)。同样,在第8周时,接受15毫克(44%)或30毫克(44%)兰索拉唑治疗的患者中报告症状完全缓解(定义为在研究访视前3天内无上腹部不适发作)的人数比接受安慰剂治疗的患者(29%,P <0.001)更多。然而,仅在入组时至少有一些烧心症状的患者中观察到上腹部不适有所改善。

结论

每日剂量为15毫克或30毫克的兰索拉唑在减轻伴有至少一些烧心症状的持续性或复发性上腹部不适症状方面明显优于安慰剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验