Desloire Sophie, Valiente Moro Claire, Chauve Claude, Zenner Lionel
Unité Mixte de Recherche PEV ENVL/INRA 958, Service de Parasitologie, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Lyon, 1 avenue Bourgelat, BP 83, 69280 Marcy l'Etoile, France.
Vet Res. 2006 Sep-Oct;37(5):725-32. doi: 10.1051/vetres:2006031. Epub 2006 Jul 6.
Dermanyssus gallinae is one of the most serious ectoparasites of poultry and it has been implicated as a vector of several major pathogenic diseases. Molecular detection of such pathogens in mites is crucial and therefore, an important step is the extraction of their DNA from mites. So, we compared four DNA extraction protocols from engorged and unfed individual mites: a conventional method using a Cethyl Trimethyl Ammonium Bromide buffer (CTAB), a Chelex resin, a Qiamp DNA extraction kit and a more recent one filter-based technology (FTA). The DNA samples have been tested for their ability to be amplified by an amplification of a D. gallinae 16S rRNA gene region. The best results were obtained using CTAB and Qiagen methods at the same time with unfed and engorged mites (96% and 100% of amplified samples). FTA produced similar results when using unfed mites but not when processing engorged ones (96% and 70%). Finally, the Chelex method was the least efficient in terms of DNA amplification, especially when applied on engorged individuals (50%). The possible inhibitor role of these Chelex extracted DNA was demonstrated by the means of a PCR control on PUC plasmid. No difference was observed with CTAB, Qiamp DNA extraction kit or FTA methods using DNA extracted one year before.
鸡皮刺螨是家禽最严重的体外寄生虫之一,并且被认为是几种主要致病疾病的传播媒介。对螨类中的此类病原体进行分子检测至关重要,因此,从螨类中提取其DNA是重要的一步。所以,我们比较了从饱血和未饱血的单个螨类中提取DNA的四种方法:一种使用十六烷基三甲基溴化铵缓冲液(CTAB)的传统方法、一种螯合树脂法、一种Qiamp DNA提取试剂盒法以及一种更新的基于滤膜的技术(FTA)。已对DNA样本进行检测,以评估其通过扩增鸡皮刺螨16S rRNA基因区域进行扩增的能力。同时使用CTAB和Qiagen方法处理未饱血和饱血螨类时获得了最佳结果(扩增样本分别为96%和100%)。使用未饱血螨类时FTA产生了相似的结果,但处理饱血螨类时并非如此(分别为96%和70%)。最后,就DNA扩增而言,螯合树脂法效率最低,尤其是应用于饱血个体时(50%)。通过对PUC质粒进行PCR对照证明了这些用螯合树脂提取的DNA可能具有抑制作用。使用一年前提取的DNA时,CTAB法、Qiamp DNA提取试剂盒法或FTA法未观察到差异。