Kahn Jeremy M, Goss Christopher H, Heagerty Patrick J, Kramer Andrew A, O'Brien Chelsea R, Rubenfeld Gordon D
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle 98104, USA.
N Engl J Med. 2006 Jul 6;355(1):41-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa053993.
An increased volume of patients is associated with improved survival in numerous high-risk medical and surgical conditions. The relationship between the number of patients admitted (hospital volume) and outcome among patients with critical illnesses is unknown.
We analyzed data from 20,241 nonsurgical patients receiving mechanical ventilation at 37 acute care hospitals in the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation clinical information system from 2002 through 2003. Multivariate analyses were performed to adjust for the severity of illness and other differences in the case mix.
An increase in hospital volume was associated with improved survival among patients receiving mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU) and in the hospital. Admission to a hospital in the highest quartile according to volume (i.e., >400 patients receiving mechanical ventilation per year) was associated with a 37 percent reduction in the adjusted odds of death in the ICU as compared with admission to hospitals in the lowest quartile (< or =150 patients receiving mechanical ventilation per year, P<0.001). In-hospital mortality was similarly reduced (adjusted odds ratio, 0.66; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.52 to 0.83; P<0.001). A typical patient in a hospital in a low-volume quartile would have an adjusted in-hospital mortality of 34.2 percent as compared with 25.5 percent in a hospital in a high-volume quartile. Among survivors, there were no significant trends in the length of stay in the ICU or the hospital.
Mechanical ventilation of patients in a hospital with a high case volume is associated with reduced mortality. Further research is needed to determine the mechanism of the relationship between volume and outcome among patients with a critical illness.
在众多高风险医疗和外科疾病中,患者数量增加与生存率提高相关。危重症患者的入院人数(医院规模)与预后之间的关系尚不清楚。
我们分析了2002年至2003年期间在急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估临床信息系统中37家急性护理医院接受机械通气的20241例非手术患者的数据。进行多变量分析以调整疾病严重程度和病例组合中的其他差异。
医院规模的增加与重症监护病房(ICU)和医院中接受机械通气患者的生存率提高相关。根据规模,入住最高四分位数的医院(即每年>400例接受机械通气的患者)与入住最低四分位数的医院(每年≤150例接受机械通气的患者)相比,ICU中调整后的死亡几率降低了37%(P<0.001)。住院死亡率也同样降低(调整后的优势比为0.66;95%置信区间为0.52至0.83;P<0.001)。低规模四分位数医院中的典型患者调整后的住院死亡率为34.2%,而高规模四分位数医院中的为25.5%。在幸存者中,ICU或医院的住院时间没有显著趋势。
高病例量医院中患者的机械通气与死亡率降低相关。需要进一步研究以确定危重症患者中规模与预后之间关系的机制。