Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine.
Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, Medical School.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2024 May;21(5):774-781. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202308-684OC.
Intermediate care (also termed "step-down" or "moderate care") has been proposed as a lower cost alternative to care for patients who may not clearly benefit from intensive care unit admission. Intermediate care units may be appealing to hospitals in financial crisis, including those in rural areas. Outcomes of patients receiving intermediate care are not widely described. To examine relationships among rurality, location of care, and mortality for mechanically ventilated patients. Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older who received invasive mechanical ventilation between 2010 and 2019 were included. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the association between admission to a rural or an urban hospital and 30-day mortality, with separate analyses for patients in general, intermediate, and intensive care. Models were adjusted for age, sex, area deprivation index, primary diagnosis, severity of illness, year, comorbidities, and hospital volume. There were 2,752,492 hospitalizations for patients receiving mechanical ventilation from 2010 to 2019, and 193,745 patients (7.0%) were in rural hospitals. The proportion of patients in rural intermediate care increased from 4.1% in 2010 to 6.3% in 2019. Patient admissions to urban hospitals remained relatively stable. Patients in rural and urban intensive care units had similar adjusted 30-day mortality, at 46.7% (adjusted absolute risk difference -0.1% [95% confidence interval, -0.7% to 0.6%]; = 0.88). However, adjusted 30-day mortality for patients in rural intermediate care was significantly higher (36.9%) than for patients in urban intermediate care (31.3%) (adjusted absolute risk difference 5.6% [95% confidence interval, 3.7% to 7.6%]; < 0.001). Hospitalization in rural intermediate care was associated with increased mortality. There is a need to better understand how intermediate care is used across hospitals and to carefully evaluate the types of patients admitted to intermediate care units.
过渡护理(也称为“下调节”或“中度护理”)被提议作为一种成本较低的替代方案,用于治疗那些可能从重症监护病房入院中获益不明显的患者。过渡护理病房可能对处于财务危机中的医院具有吸引力,包括农村地区的医院。接受过渡护理的患者的结果并未广泛描述。 研究农村地区、护理地点与机械通气患者死亡率之间的关系。 研究对象为 2010 年至 2019 年间接受有创机械通气的年龄在 65 岁及以上的 Medicare 受益人群。使用多变量逻辑回归来估计入住农村或城市医院与 30 天死亡率之间的关联,对普通、中级和重症监护患者分别进行分析。模型调整了年龄、性别、地区贫困指数、主要诊断、疾病严重程度、年份、合并症和医院容量。 2010 年至 2019 年期间,共有 2752492 名患者因机械通气住院,其中 193745 名(7.0%)在农村医院。2010 年,农村中级护理患者的比例为 4.1%,到 2019 年增至 6.3%。入住城市医院的患者相对稳定。农村和城市重症监护病房的患者调整后 30 天死亡率相似,分别为 46.7%(调整后的绝对风险差异-0.1%[95%置信区间,-0.7%至 0.6%]; = 0.88)。然而,农村中级护理患者调整后 30 天死亡率明显高于城市中级护理患者(36.9%)(调整后的绝对风险差异 5.6%[95%置信区间,3.7%至 7.6%]; < 0.001)。 农村中级护理住院与死亡率增加相关。需要更好地了解医院如何使用中级护理,以及仔细评估收入中级护理病房的患者类型。