Suppr超能文献

骨骼肌的电刺激。慢性心力衰竭患者有氧运动训练的替代方法?

Electrical stimulation of skeletal muscles. An alternative to aerobic exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure?

作者信息

Dobsák Petr, Nováková Marie, Fiser Bohumil, Siegelová Jarmila, Balcárková Pavla, Spinarová Lenka, Vítovec Jirí, Minami Naoyoshi, Nagasaka Makoto, Kohzuki Masahiro, Yambe Tomoyuki, Imachi Kou, Nitta Shin-ichi, Eicher Jean-Christophe, Wolf Jean-Eric

机构信息

Department of Functional Diagnostics and Rehabilitation, St. Anna Faculty Hospital and Masaryk University of Brno, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Int Heart J. 2006 May;47(3):441-53. doi: 10.1536/ihj.47.441.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate whether electrical stimulation of skeletal muscles could represent a rehabilitation alternative for patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Thirty patients with CHF and NYHA class II-III were randomly assigned to a rehabilitation program using either electrical stimulation of skeletal muscles or bicycle training. Patients in the first group (n = 15) had 8 weeks of home-based low-frequency electrical stimulation (LFES) applied simultaneously to the quadriceps and calf muscles of both legs (1 h/day for 7 days/week); patients in the second group (n = 15) underwent 8 weeks of 40 minute aerobic exercise (3 times a week). After the 8-week period significant increases in several functional parameters were observed in both groups: maximal VO2 uptake (LFES group: from 17.5 +/- 4.4 mL/kg/min to 18.3 +/- 4.2 mL/kg/min, P < 0.05; bicycle group: from 18.1 +/- 3.9 mL/kg/min to 19.3 +/- 4.1 mL/kg/min, P < 0.01), maximal workload (LFES group: from 84.3 +/- 15.2 W to 95.9 +/- 9.8 W, P < 0.05; bicycle group: from 91.2 +/- 13.4 W to 112.9 +/- 10.8 W, P < 0.01), distance walked in 6 minutes (LFES group: from 398 +/- 105 m to 435 +/- 112 m, P < 0.05; bicycle group: from 425 +/- 118 m to 483 +/- 120 m, P < 0.03), and exercise duration (LFES group: from 488 +/- 45 seconds to 568 +/- 120 seconds, P < 0.05; bicycle group: from 510 +/- 90 seconds to 611 +/- 112 seconds, P < 0.03). These results demonstrate that an improvement of exercise capacities can be achieved either by classical exercise training or by home-based electrical stimulation. LFES should be considered as a valuable alternative to classical exercise training in patients with CHF.

摘要

本研究的目的是调查骨骼肌电刺激是否可作为慢性心力衰竭(CHF)患者的一种康复替代方案。30例纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能分级为II - III级的CHF患者被随机分配到一个康复项目中,该项目采用骨骼肌电刺激或自行车训练。第一组(n = 15)患者在家中进行为期8周的低频电刺激(LFES),同时对双腿的股四头肌和小腿肌肉进行刺激(每天1小时,每周7天);第二组(n = 15)患者进行为期8周的有氧运动,每次40分钟(每周3次)。8周后,两组患者的几个功能参数均显著增加:最大摄氧量(LFES组:从17.5±4.4 mL/kg/min增至18.3±4.2 mL/kg/min,P < 0.05;自行车组:从18.1±3.9 mL/kg/min增至19.3±4.1 mL/kg/min,P < 0.01)、最大工作量(LFES组:从84.3±15.2 W增至95.9±9.8 W,P < 0.05;自行车组:从91.2±13.4 W增至112.9±10.8 W, P < 0.01)、6分钟步行距离(LFES组:从398±105 m增至435±112 m,P < 0.05;自行车组:从425±118 m增至483±12 m,P < 0.03)以及运动持续时间(LFES组:从488±45秒增至568±120秒,P < 0.05;自行车组:从510±90秒增至611±112秒,P < 0.03)。这些结果表明,通过传统运动训练或家庭式电刺激均可实现运动能力的改善。对于CHF患者,LFES应被视为传统运动训练的一种有价值的替代方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验