• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诊断成像技术与治疗设备评估:获取更优信息,做出更佳决策:多学科研讨会会议记录

Evaluation of diagnostic imaging technologies and therapeutics devices: better information for better decisions: proceedings of a multidisciplinary workshop.

作者信息

Califf Robert M

机构信息

Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC 27715, USA.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2006 Jul;152(1):50-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.10.001.

DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2005.10.001
PMID:16824831
Abstract

We are entering an era in which the success of biomedical science and the increasing understanding of the value of evidence for practice are in a state of tension. This tension is especially notable in the device arena, in which the short life cycles and iterative nature of development are at odds with current design constructs of the types of clinical trials that provide evidence for medical decision making. The financial pressure arising from strained budgets and expanding costs from the aging of the population and the continued development of new technology heightens the need for a focus on new approaches. Given this background, a group of experts representing constituencies with different perspectives were convened for a day and a half to discuss key issues and their potential solutions. Because of the complex and heterogeneous nature of the environments in which devices are used, the meeting focused on 3 broad, general uses of devices: imaging, risk stratification, and therapeutics. The goal of the meeting was to develop a preliminary list of ideas that could be framed as researchable questions or constructs for consideration by policy makers that ultimately might lead to improvements in the current system. Across diagnostic imaging, risk stratification devices, and therapeutic devices, the crosscutting issues can be identified: We need better methods of collaborative funding and priority setting, improved and more flexible methods, and new approaches to the integration of federal agencies in overseeing the system.

摘要

我们正进入一个生物医学科学的成功与对实践证据价值的日益理解处于紧张状态的时代。这种紧张在器械领域尤为明显,在该领域中,产品的短生命周期和迭代式开发性质与当前为医疗决策提供证据的临床试验类型的设计架构不一致。由于预算紧张以及人口老龄化和新技术持续发展导致成本不断增加所带来的财务压力,更加凸显了关注新方法的必要性。在此背景下,召集了一群代表不同观点的专家,举行为期一天半的会议,以讨论关键问题及其潜在解决方案。鉴于器械使用环境的复杂性和异质性,会议聚焦于器械的三大广泛通用用途:成像、风险分层和治疗。会议的目标是制定一份初步的想法清单,这些想法可被构建为供政策制定者考虑的可研究问题或构想,最终可能会改进当前系统。在诊断成像、风险分层器械和治疗器械领域,可以确定一些共同问题:我们需要更好的合作资金筹集和优先级设定方法、改进且更灵活的方法,以及联邦机构在监督该系统方面的新整合方式。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of diagnostic imaging technologies and therapeutics devices: better information for better decisions: proceedings of a multidisciplinary workshop.诊断成像技术与治疗设备评估:获取更优信息,做出更佳决策:多学科研讨会会议记录
Am Heart J. 2006 Jul;152(1):50-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.10.001.
2
Satisfying the requirements of the Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Medicare and Medicare Services.满足美国食品药品监督管理局以及医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的要求。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2008 Mar;5(3):189-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2007.09.005.
3
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
4
Conditionally funded field evaluations and practical trial design within a health technology assessment framework.卫生技术评估框架内的有条件资助的现场评估和实际试验设计。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2009 May;6(5):324-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.01.023.
5
The Food and Drug Administration and atrial defibrillation devices.美国食品药品监督管理局与心房颤动除颤设备
Am J Manag Care. 1999 Jul;5(7):899-909.
6
Using the MADIT II criteria for implantable cardioverter defibrillators-what is the role of the Food and Drug Administration approval?采用植入式心脏复律除颤器的MADIT II标准——美国食品药品监督管理局批准的作用是什么?
Card Electrophysiol Rev. 2003 Dec;7(4):443-6. doi: 10.1023/B:CEPR.0000023166.65777.6f.
7
Policy formulation and technology assessment.政策制定与技术评估。
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1981 Summer;59(3):445-79.
8
Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.避免和识别健康技术评估模型中的错误:定性研究和方法学综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. doi: 10.3310/hta14250.
9
Assessment and approval of medical devices used in diagnostic imaging in the United States.
Isr J Med Sci. 1986 Jul-Aug;22(7-8):505-18.
10
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: randomized trial evidence through 2004.左心室功能不全患者的植入式心脏复律除颤器和心脏再同步治疗:截至2004年的随机试验证据
Am Heart J. 2005 Jun;149(6):1020-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.02.005.

引用本文的文献

1
Trial registration for public trust: making the case for medical devices.为公众信任进行试验注册:论证医疗设备的必要性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jan;23 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):64-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0300-7.