强化消肿物理治疗后乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的长期管理
Long-term management of breast cancer-related lymphedema after intensive decongestive physiotherapy.
作者信息
Vignes Stéphane, Porcher Raphaël, Arrault Maria, Dupuy Alain
机构信息
Department of Lymphology, Hôpital Cognacq-Jay, Site Broussais, 102 rue Didot, 75014 Paris, France.
出版信息
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007 Mar;101(3):285-90. doi: 10.1007/s10549-006-9297-6. Epub 2006 Jul 7.
BACKGROUND
Treatment of lymphedema is based on intensive decongestive physiotherapy followed by a long-term maintenance treatment. We analyzed the factors influencing lymphedema volume during maintenance treatment.
METHOD
Prospective cohort of 537 patients with secondary arm lymphedema were recruited in a single lymphology unit and followed for 12 months. Lymphedema volume was recorded prior to and at the end of intensive treatment, and at month 6 and month 12 follow-up visits. Multivariate models were fitted to analyze the respective role of the three components of complete decongestive therapy, i.e. manual lymph drainage, low stretch bandage, and elastic sleeve, on lymphedema volume during the 1-year maintenance phase therapy.
RESULTS
Mean volume of lymphedema was 1,054 +/- 633 ml prior and 647 +/- 351 ml after intensive decongestive physiotherapy. During the 1-year maintenance phase therapy, the mean lymphedema volume slightly increased (84 ml-95% confidence interval [CI]: 56-113). Fifty-two percent of patients had their lymphedema volume increased above 10% from their value at the end of the intensive decongestive physiotherapy treatment phase. Non-compliance to low stretch bandage and elastic sleeve were risk factors for an increased lymphedema after 1-year of maintenance treatment (RR: 1.55 [95% CI: 1.3-1.76]; P < 0.0001 and RR: 1.61 (95% CI: 1.25-1.82); P = 0.002, respectively). Non-compliance to MLD was not a risk factor (RR: 0.99 [95% CI: 0.77-1.2]; P = 0.91).
CONCLUSION
During maintenance phase after intensive decongestive physiotherapy, compliance to the use of elastic sleeve and low stretch bandage should be required to stabilize lymphedema volume.
背景
淋巴水肿的治疗基于强化消肿物理治疗,随后进行长期维持治疗。我们分析了维持治疗期间影响淋巴水肿体积的因素。
方法
在单个淋巴学科室招募了537例继发性上肢淋巴水肿患者的前瞻性队列,并随访12个月。在强化治疗前、强化治疗结束时、随访6个月和12个月时记录淋巴水肿体积。采用多变量模型分析完全消肿治疗的三个组成部分,即手法淋巴引流、低弹力绷带和弹力袖套,在1年维持期治疗期间对淋巴水肿体积的各自作用。
结果
强化消肿物理治疗前淋巴水肿的平均体积为1054±633ml,治疗后为647±351ml。在1年维持期治疗期间,淋巴水肿的平均体积略有增加(84ml - 95%置信区间[CI]:56 - 113)。52%的患者淋巴水肿体积比强化消肿物理治疗阶段结束时的值增加了10%以上。不依从低弹力绷带和弹力袖套是维持治疗1年后淋巴水肿增加的危险因素(相对危险度:1.55[95%CI:1.3 - 1.76];P<0.0001和相对危险度:1.61[95%CI:1.25 - 1.82];P = 0.002)。不依从手法淋巴引流不是危险因素(相对危险度:0.99[95%CI:0.77 - 1.2];P = 0.91)。
结论
在强化消肿物理治疗后的维持阶段,应要求患者依从使用弹力袖套和低弹力绷带,以稳定淋巴水肿体积。