Quéré I, Presles E, Coupé M, Vignes S, Vaillant L, Eveno D, Laporte S, Leizorovicz A
EA 2992, Vascular Medicine Unit, CIC1001 Inserm, CHU de Montpellier, université Montpellier 1, 34295 cedex 5 Montpellier, France.
Inserm, CIE3, unité de recherche clinique, innovation et pharmacologie, CHU de Saint-Étienne, 42055 Saint-Étienne, France.
J Mal Vasc. 2014 Jul;39(4):256-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jmv.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
Lymphedema treatment is based on Decongestive Lymphedema Therapy (DLT) with an intensive phase followed by a long-term maintenance phase. This study aimed to observe volume variation over the intensive phase and 6 months later.
Prospective multicentre observational study of patients with unilateral lymphedema. The primary objective was to assess lymphedema volume variation between baseline, the end of intensive phase and 6 months later. Secondary objectives were to assess the frequency of heaviness limiting limb function and treatments safety predictors for volume reduction.
Three hundred and six patients (89.9% women; 59.9±14.3 years old) with upper/lower (n=184/122) limb lymphedema were included. At the end of the intensive phase, median excess lymphedema volume reduction was 31.0% (41.7-19.9) followed by a 16.5% (5.9-42.3) median increase over the 6-month maintenance period phase. Previous intensive treatment was the only significant predictor of this response. As compared to baseline, heaviness limiting limb use was much less frequently reported at the end of the reductive phase (75.5% versus 42.3% respectively), and was more frequent at the end of the maintenance phase (62.6%). The most frequent adverse events reported were skin redness and compression marks (18.4 and 15.7% of patients, respectively). Blisters requiring treatment stoppage were rare (1.4%).
Intensive phase decreases lymphedema volume and heaviness limiting limb function. The benefit is partially abolished after the first 6 months of maintenance. There is a need to consider how to provide optimal patient care for the long-term control of lymphedema.
淋巴水肿治疗基于消肿淋巴水肿疗法(DLT),包括一个强化阶段和随后的长期维持阶段。本研究旨在观察强化阶段及6个月后的体积变化。
对单侧淋巴水肿患者进行前瞻性多中心观察性研究。主要目的是评估基线、强化阶段结束时和6个月后的淋巴水肿体积变化。次要目的是评估限制肢体功能的沉重感发生频率以及体积减少的治疗安全性预测因素。
纳入306例上肢/下肢(n = 184/122)淋巴水肿患者(89.9%为女性;59.9±14.3岁)。在强化阶段结束时,淋巴水肿多余体积的中位数减少了31.0%(41.7 - 19.9),随后在6个月的维持期阶段中位数增加了16.5%(5.9 - 42.3)。先前的强化治疗是这种反应的唯一显著预测因素。与基线相比,在减少阶段结束时,报告限制肢体使用的沉重感的频率要低得多(分别为75.5%和42.3%),而在维持阶段结束时更频繁(62.6%)。报告的最常见不良事件是皮肤发红和压迫痕迹(分别为18.4%和15.7%的患者)。需要停止治疗的水泡很少见(1.4%)。
强化阶段可减少淋巴水肿体积和限制肢体功能的沉重感。在维持的前6个月后,这种益处部分消失。需要考虑如何为淋巴水肿的长期控制提供最佳的患者护理。