Estner Heidi Luise, Deisenhofer Isabel, Luik Armin, Ndrepepa Gjin, von Bary Christian, Zrenner Bernhard, Schmitt Claus
Deutsches Herzzentrum München, 1. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Lazarettstrasse 36, D-80636 München, Germany.
Europace. 2006 Aug;8(8):583-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eul079. Epub 2006 Jul 10.
The aim of the study was to investigate the feasibility of performing segmental pulmonary vein (PV) isolation guided by the NavX (Endocardial Solutions, St Jude Medical, Inc., St Paul, MN, USA) system without the three-dimensional (3D) geometric reconstruction option and whether the use of NavX system will reduce the radiation exposure and procedure duration.
The study included 64 patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or permanent atrial fibrillation, in whom PV isolation was performed using fluoroscopic guidance (n=32) or the NavX system (n=32). Pulmonary vein mapping with a circular mapping catheter allowed the identification and localization of myocardial connections between the PV and the left atrium. PV isolation was performed by radiofrequency ablation of these connections at the atrial aspect of the PV ostium. Primary success rate for isolated PVs did not differ significantly in patients ablated under fluoroscopic guidance vs. those ablated under guidance of NavX system [100/107 PVs (93.5%) vs. 120/124 PV (96.8%; P=n.s.)]. Compared with fluoroscopy guided procedures, NavX-guided procedures showed a significant reduction in the fluoroscopy time (75.8+/-24.5 vs. 38.9+/-19.3 min, P<0.05), total X-ray exposure (93.2+/-51.6 vs. 56.6+/-37.9 Gy cm(2), P=0.03), and total procedural time (237.7+/-65.4 vs. 188.6+/-62.7 min, P=0.01). The mean follow-up was 9.5+/-3.0 months. One patient in each group was lost to follow-up. Seven-day Holter monitoring showed that 23 of 31 patients (74.2%) in the NavX-guided group and 21 of 31 patients (67.7%) in the fluoroscopy-guided group were in sinus rhythm (P=0.57).
The 3D visualization of the catheters by NavX system allows a rapid and precise visualization of the mapping and ablation catheters at the PV ostia and markedly reduces fluoroscopy time, total X-ray exposure, and procedural duration during PV isolation compared with ablation performed under fluoroscopy guidance.
本研究旨在探讨在不使用三维(3D)几何重建选项的情况下,使用NavX系统(美国明尼苏达州圣保罗市圣犹达医疗公司心内膜解决方案部)引导进行节段性肺静脉(PV)隔离的可行性,以及使用NavX系统是否会减少辐射暴露和手术时间。
本研究纳入64例有症状的阵发性或永久性心房颤动患者,其中32例使用荧光透视引导进行PV隔离,32例使用NavX系统进行PV隔离。使用环形标测导管进行肺静脉标测,以识别和定位肺静脉与左心房之间的心肌连接。通过在肺静脉口的心房侧对这些连接进行射频消融来进行PV隔离。荧光透视引导下消融的患者与NavX系统引导下消融的患者相比,隔离肺静脉的首次成功率无显著差异[107条肺静脉中有100条(93.5%) vs. 124条肺静脉中有120条(96.8%;P=无统计学意义)]。与荧光透视引导的手术相比,NavX引导的手术在透视时间(75.8±24.5 vs. 38.9±19.3分钟,P<0.05)、总X线暴露量(93.2±51.6 vs. 56.6±37.9 Gy cm²,P=0.03)和总手术时间(237.7±65.4 vs. 188.6±62.7分钟,P=0.01)方面均显著降低。平均随访时间为9.5±3.0个月。每组各有1例患者失访。7天动态心电图监测显示,NavX引导组31例患者中有23例(74.2%)、荧光透视引导组31例患者中有21例(67.7%)恢复窦性心律(P=0.57)。
与荧光透视引导下的消融相比,NavX系统对导管的三维可视化可使肺静脉口处的标测和消融导管快速、精确地可视化,并显著减少PV隔离期间的透视时间、总X线暴露量和手术时间。