Suppr超能文献

因心房颤动消融术而转诊的患者发生房室结折返性心动过速:对包含慢径路改良的消融术的反应

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in patients referred for atrial fibrillation ablation: response to ablation that incorporates slow-pathway modification.

作者信息

Sauer William H, Alonso Concepcion, Zado Erica, Cooper Joshua M, Lin David, Dixit Sanjay, Russo Andrea, Verdino Ralph, Ji Sen, Gerstenfeld Edward P, Callans David J, Marchlinski Francis E

机构信息

Electrophysiology Section, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Circulation. 2006 Jul 18;114(3):191-5. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.621896. Epub 2006 Jul 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the most common sites of atrial ectopy that trigger atrial fibrillation (AF) are in or around the pulmonary veins (PVs), atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) can also cause or coexist with AF. We sought to characterize patients with AF and AVNRT and assess clinical outcomes after ablation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

To determine the prevalence of concomitant AVNRT and AF, 629 consecutive patients referred for catheter ablation between November 1998 and March 2005 were studied. Electrophysiological studies with programmed stimulation during isoproterenol infusion identified atrial ectopy that initiated AF and the presence of inducible AVNRT. AF ablation consisted of proximal isolation of PVs and elimination of any non-PV trigger of AF, including AVNRT. There were 27 patients (4.3%) who had inducible AVNRT at the time of AF ablation. Of these, 13 underwent AVNRT ablation without PV isolation. Compared with the rest of the cohort, patients with AVNRT and AF were younger at the time of symptom onset (age 36.8+/-13.8 versus 48.2+/-11.7 years; P<0.01). Freedom from AF with or without previously ineffective antiarrhythmic medication was similar in both groups (96.3% versus 90.7%; mean follow-up 21.4+/-9.4 months); however, patients with AVNRT targeted for ablation were more likely to be AF free while not taking any antiarrhythmic medication after a single procedure during the follow-up period (87.5% versus 54.7%; P<0.01) and had fewer complications (0% versus 2.5%; P=0.30). Twelve of the 13 patients who underwent slow-pathway ablation without left atrial ablation remained AF free without the need for antiarrhythmic medication after a single procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

AVNRT is an uncommon AF trigger seen more frequently in younger patients. Ablation of AVNRT in patients with AF was associated with improved outcomes compared with those with other triggers of AF.

摘要

背景

虽然触发心房颤动(AF)的最常见心房异位起搏点位于肺静脉(PV)内或其周围,但房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)也可导致AF或与AF并存。我们旨在对AF合并AVNRT的患者进行特征描述,并评估消融术后的临床结局。

方法与结果

为确定AVNRT与AF并存的患病率,我们对1998年11月至2005年3月期间连续629例接受导管消融术的患者进行了研究。在输注异丙肾上腺素期间进行程控刺激的电生理研究确定了引发AF的心房异位起搏点以及可诱发的AVNRT的存在。AF消融包括PV近端隔离以及消除AF的任何非PV触发因素,包括AVNRT。有27例患者(4.3%)在AF消融时可诱发AVNRT。其中,13例患者在未进行PV隔离的情况下接受了AVNRT消融。与队列中的其他患者相比,AVNRT合并AF的患者症状发作时年龄更小(36.8±13.8岁对48.2±11.7岁;P<0.01)。两组在使用或未使用过无效抗心律失常药物的情况下无AF的情况相似(96.3%对90.7%;平均随访21.4±9.4个月);然而,接受AVNRT消融的患者在随访期间单次手术后未服用任何抗心律失常药物时更有可能无AF(87.5%对54.7%;P<0.01),且并发症更少(0%对2.5%;P=0.30)。13例接受慢径消融而未进行左心房消融的患者中有12例在单次手术后无需服用抗心律失常药物即可保持无AF状态。

结论

AVNRT是一种在年轻患者中更常见的不常见AF触发因素。与AF的其他触发因素相比,对AF患者进行AVNRT消融与更好的结局相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验