Ferrin Donald L, Dirks Kurt T, Shah Pri P
Lee Kong Chian School of Business, Singapore Management University, Singapore.
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Jul;91(4):870-83. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.870.
Past studies of the determinants of interpersonal trust have focused primarily on how trust forms in isolated dyads. Yet within organizations, trust typically develops between individuals who are embedded in a complex web of existing and potential relationships. In this article, the authors identify 3 alternative ways in which a trustor and trustee may be linked to each other via third parties: network closure (linked via social interactions with third parties), trust transferability (linked via trusted third parties), and structural equivalence (linked via the similarity of their relationships with all potential third parties within the organization). Each of these is argued to influence interpersonal trust via a distinct social mechanism. The authors hypothesized that network closure and structural equivalence would predict interpersonal trust indirectly via their impact on interpersonal organizational citizenship behaviors performed within the interpersonal relationship, whereas trust transferability would predict trust directly. Social network analyses of data gathered from a medium-sized work organization provide substantial support for the hypotheses and also suggest important directions for future research.
以往关于人际信任决定因素的研究主要集中在信任如何在孤立的二元关系中形成。然而在组织内部,信任通常在嵌入复杂的现有和潜在关系网络中的个体之间发展。在本文中,作者识别出信任者和受托者可能通过第三方相互联系的三种替代方式:网络封闭(通过与第三方的社会互动联系)、信任可转移性(通过受信任的第三方联系)和结构对等(通过他们与组织内所有潜在第三方关系的相似性联系)。其中每一种方式都被认为通过独特的社会机制影响人际信任。作者假设网络封闭和结构对等将通过它们对人际关系中所表现出的人际组织公民行为的影响间接预测人际信任,而信任可转移性将直接预测信任。对从中型工作组织收集的数据进行的社会网络分析为这些假设提供了大量支持,并也为未来研究指明了重要方向。