Suppr超能文献

跨两个时间点对参与式健康研究伙伴关系中的信任进行探索:一种网络方法。

Exploration of trust in participatory health research partnerships across two timepoints: a network approach.

作者信息

Gilfoyle Meghan, Salsberg Jon, Macfarlane Anne, McCarthy Miriam, MacCarron Padraig

机构信息

Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 16;15(2):e088355. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088355.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The value of a participatory approach to the generation of evidence for health and social services from a moral, methodological and policy level continues to gain recognition globally. Trust is a crucial mechanism in the participatory health research (PHR) process and is strongly influenced by context. However, gaps remain in conceptualising and operationalising trust over time in PHR partnerships.

OBJECTIVE

This case study seeks to address these gaps by exploring the evolution of trust multidimensionally across two timepoints.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Participants in a PHR project called the Public and Patient Involvement (PPI) Ignite Network in Ireland (n=57 (T1); n=56 (T2)) were invited to complete a network survey at two timepoints. The PPI Ignite Network had local and national partners.

NETWORK MEASURES

Several core social network measures were calculated at both timepoints to characterise the differences between trust dimensions and between local and national partners.

RESULTS

Subtle changes were observed across most network measures over the two timepoints. While there was a slight decrease in the number of connections for each trust dimension throughout the PPI Ignite Network, connections that were consistently nominated in both timepoints increased slightly. Some trust dimensions, such as vulnerability and integrity, were more similar, while others, like integrity and shared values, visions and goals, differed greatly, where national partners consistently received more incoming connections compared with local partners.

CONCLUSION

These findings (1) provide empirical support for using social network analysis to operationalise trust comprehensively and multidimensionally over time in a participatory partnership, (2) offer nuanced insights into the trust development process within the PPI Ignite Network and (3) enhance our understanding of trust in the community-based participatory research model.

摘要

背景

从道德、方法和政策层面来看,参与式方法在生成健康和社会服务证据方面的价值在全球范围内不断获得认可。信任是参与式健康研究(PHR)过程中的关键机制,且受背景因素的强烈影响。然而,随着时间推移,在PHR伙伴关系中,信任的概念化和操作化仍存在差距。

目的

本案例研究旨在通过在两个时间点对信任进行多维度探索,以填补这些差距。

背景与参与者

邀请了爱尔兰一个名为“公众与患者参与(PPI)点燃网络”的PHR项目的参与者(T1阶段n = 57;T2阶段n = 56)在两个时间点完成网络调查。PPI点燃网络有地方和国家层面的合作伙伴。

网络测量

在两个时间点都计算了几个核心社会网络测量指标,以描述信任维度之间以及地方和国家合作伙伴之间的差异。

结果

在两个时间点的大多数网络测量指标中都观察到了细微变化。虽然整个PPI点燃网络中每个信任维度的连接数量略有下降,但在两个时间点都被持续提名的连接略有增加。一些信任维度,如脆弱性和诚信度,更为相似,而其他维度,如诚信与共享价值观、愿景和目标,则差异很大,国家合作伙伴始终比地方合作伙伴收到更多的传入连接。

结论

这些发现(1)为使用社会网络分析在参与式伙伴关系中随着时间全面、多维度地操作化信任提供了实证支持,(2)对PPI点燃网络内的信任发展过程提供了细致入微的见解,(3)增强了我们对基于社区的参与式研究模式中信任的理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b26d/11831290/d58800465499/bmjopen-15-2-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验