Kana Rajesh K, Keller Timothy A, Cherkassky Vladimir L, Minshew Nancy J, Just Marcel Adam
Center for Cognitive Brain Imaging, Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Brain. 2006 Sep;129(Pt 9):2484-93. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl164. Epub 2006 Jul 10.
Comprehending high-imagery sentences like The number eight when rotated 90 degrees looks like a pair of eyeglasses involves the participation and integration of several cortical regions. The linguistic content must be processed to determine what is to be mentally imaged, and then the mental image must be evaluated and related to the sentence. A theory of cortical underconnectivity in autism predicts that the interregional collaboration required between linguistic and imaginal processing in this task would be underserved in autism. This functional MRI study examined brain activation in 12 participants with autism and 13 age- and IQ-matched control participants while they processed sentences with either high- or low-imagery content. The analysis of functional connectivity among cortical regions showed that the language and spatial centres in the participants with autism were not as well synchronized as in controls. In addition to the functional connectivity differences, there was also a group difference in activation. In the processing of low-imagery sentences (e.g. Addition, subtraction and multiplication are all math skills), the use of imagery is not essential to comprehension. Nevertheless, the autism group activated parietal and occipital brain regions associated with imagery for comprehending both the low and high-imagery sentences, suggesting that they were using mental imagery in both conditions. In contrast, the control group showed imagery-related activation primarily in the high-imagery condition. The findings provide further evidence of underintegration of language and imagery in autism (and hence expand the understanding of underconnectivity) but also show that people with autism are more reliant on visualization to support language comprehension.
理解像“数字8旋转90度后看起来像一副眼镜”这样具有高意象性的句子,涉及多个皮质区域的参与和整合。必须对语言内容进行处理,以确定要在脑海中形成的意象是什么,然后必须对脑海中的意象进行评估,并将其与句子联系起来。一种关于自闭症中皮质连接不足的理论预测,在这项任务中,语言和意象处理之间所需的区域间协作在自闭症中会得不到充分支持。这项功能性磁共振成像研究,对12名自闭症患者和13名年龄及智商匹配的对照参与者在处理具有高意象或低意象内容的句子时的大脑激活情况进行了检查。对皮质区域间功能连接的分析表明,自闭症患者的语言和空间中枢不如对照组那样同步良好。除了功能连接差异外,激活方面也存在组间差异。在处理低意象性句子(例如加法、减法和乘法都是数学技能)时,意象的运用对理解并非必不可少。然而,自闭症组在理解低意象和高意象句子时,都激活了与意象相关的顶叶和枕叶脑区,这表明他们在两种情况下都在使用心理意象。相比之下,对照组主要在高意象条件下表现出与意象相关的激活。这些发现进一步证明了自闭症中语言和意象整合不足(从而扩展了对连接不足的理解),但也表明自闭症患者更依赖视觉化来支持语言理解。