Radauer C, Willerroider M, Fuchs H, Hoffmann-Sommergruber K, Thalhamer J, Ferreira F, Scheiner O, Breiteneder H
Department of Pathophysiology, Center of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Clin Exp Allergy. 2006 Jul;36(7):920-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2006.02521.x.
Profilins are cross-reactive plant allergens responsible for multiple pollen sensitization and pollen-associated food allergy. While it is assumed that profilins from different species are immunologically equivalent, some studies suggest partial or even lacking IgE cross-reactivity between certain profilins.
We aimed to obtain a semi-quantitative assessment of the contributions of conserved and species-specific epitopes to IgE binding of plant profilins.
We compared model structures of profilins from timothy, mugwort, celery and bell pepper with crystal structures of birch and latex profilins. We predicted potential conformational epitopes that consisted of contiguous patches of at least 20% surface-exposed residues. Celery and timothy profilins were purified from their natural sources, and profilins from birch, mugwort, bell pepper and latex were expressed in Escherichia coli. The structural integrity of all purified proteins was confirmed by circular dichroism spectroscopy. IgE ELISAs and ELISA inhibitions using sera from 22 profilin-sensitized allergic patients were carried out.
Peptide backbone conformations of all six profilins were highly similar. Nine variable epitopes and two containing high proportions of conserved residues were predicted. IgE from all sera bound to all tested profilins and the amounts were highly correlated. However, IgE inhibition experiments revealed that up to 60% of total IgE binding was mediated by species-specific epitopes. The extent of cross-reactivity among profilins from timothy, birch, latex and celery was greater than cross-reactivity to mugwort and bell pepper profilins. This pattern was mirrored by sequence similarities among one of the predicted variable epitopes. Patients with IgE to cross-reactive epitopes displayed allergic reactions to a greater number of plant foods than patients having IgE directed to species-specific epitopes.
The large extent of cross-reactivity among plant profilins justifies using a single profilin for diagnosis. However, the fine specificity of IgE directed to variable epitopes may influence the clinical manifestation of profilin sensitization.
肌动蛋白单体结合蛋白是交叉反应性植物过敏原,可导致多种花粉致敏和花粉相关的食物过敏。虽然人们认为不同物种的肌动蛋白单体结合蛋白在免疫上是等效的,但一些研究表明某些肌动蛋白单体结合蛋白之间存在部分甚至缺乏IgE交叉反应性。
我们旨在对半定量评估保守表位和物种特异性表位对植物肌动蛋白单体结合蛋白IgE结合的贡献。
我们将梯牧草、艾蒿、芹菜和甜椒的肌动蛋白单体结合蛋白的模型结构与桦树和乳胶肌动蛋白单体结合蛋白的晶体结构进行了比较。我们预测了潜在的构象表位,其由至少20%表面暴露残基的连续片段组成。芹菜和梯牧草的肌动蛋白单体结合蛋白从其天然来源中纯化,桦树、艾蒿、甜椒和乳胶的肌动蛋白单体结合蛋白在大肠杆菌中表达。所有纯化蛋白的结构完整性通过圆二色光谱法确认。使用来自22名对肌动蛋白单体结合蛋白致敏的过敏患者的血清进行IgE ELISA和ELISA抑制实验。
所有六种肌动蛋白单体结合蛋白的肽主链构象高度相似。预测了九个可变表位和两个含有高比例保守残基的表位。所有血清中的IgE都与所有测试的肌动蛋白单体结合蛋白结合,且量高度相关。然而,IgE抑制实验表明,高达60%的总IgE结合是由物种特异性表位介导的。梯牧草、桦树、乳胶和芹菜的肌动蛋白单体结合蛋白之间的交叉反应程度大于对艾蒿和甜椒肌动蛋白单体结合蛋白的交叉反应。这种模式在其中一个预测的可变表位之间的序列相似性中得到反映。对交叉反应表位有IgE的患者比具有针对物种特异性表位的IgE的患者对更多数量的植物性食物表现出过敏反应。
植物肌动蛋白单体结合蛋白之间的广泛交叉反应性证明使用单一肌动蛋白单体结合蛋白进行诊断是合理的。然而,针对可变表位的IgE的精细特异性可能会影响肌动蛋白单体结合蛋白致敏的临床表现。