Gunn Jane, Diggens Justine, Hegarty Kelsey, Blashki Grant
Primary Care Research Unit, Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne 200 Berkeley St, Carlton, Melbourne, Australia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Jul 16;6:88. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-88.
Primary care is being encouraged to implement multiprofessional, system level, chronic illness management approaches to depression. We undertook this study to identify and assess the quality of RCTs testing system level depression management interventions in primary care and to determine whether these interventions improve recovery.
Searches of Medline and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials. 'System level' interventions included: multi-professional approach, enhanced inter-professional communication, scheduled patient follow-up, structured management plan.
11 trials met all inclusion criteria. 10 were undertaken in the USA. Most focussed on antidepressant compliance. Quality of reporting assessed using CONSORT criteria was poor. Eight trials reported an increase in the proportion of patients recovered in favour of the intervention group, yet did not account for attrition rates ranging from 5 to 50%.
System level interventions implemented in the USA with patients willing to take anti-depressant medication leads to a modest increase in recovery from depression. The relevance of these interventions to countries with strong primary care systems requires testing in a randomised controlled trial.
初级保健领域正被鼓励实施多专业、系统层面的慢性病抑郁症管理方法。我们开展这项研究,旨在识别和评估在初级保健中测试系统层面抑郁症管理干预措施的随机对照试验的质量,并确定这些干预措施是否能促进康复。
检索Medline和Cochrane对照试验注册库。“系统层面”干预措施包括:多专业方法、加强专业间沟通、定期患者随访、结构化管理计划。
11项试验符合所有纳入标准。其中10项在美国进行。大多数试验聚焦于抗抑郁药的依从性。使用CONSORT标准评估的报告质量较差。8项试验报告称干预组康复患者比例有所增加,但未考虑5%至50%的失访率。
在美国对愿意服用抗抑郁药物的患者实施系统层面干预措施,会使抑郁症康复率略有提高。这些干预措施与初级保健系统完善的国家的相关性,需要通过随机对照试验进行检验。