Suppr超能文献

信念与行为问卷(BBQ)的编制与验证

Development and validation of the Beliefs and Behaviour Questionnaire (BBQ).

作者信息

George Johnson, Mackinnon Andrew, Kong David C M, Stewart Kay

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Practice, Victorian College of Pharmacy, Monash University, Parkville, Australia.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Dec;64(1-3):50-60. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.11.010. Epub 2006 Jul 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a questionnaire to screen for potential nonadherence in patients with chronic ailments.

METHODS

Themes from qualitative interviews with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients were used in developing content of the questionnaire. The questionnaire was distributed to 525 ambulatory patients with chronic lung diseases. Principal components analysis was performed to identify the subscales in the questionnaire. Internal consistency, validity and stability of the subscales were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The 30-item Beliefs and Behaviour Questionnaire (BBQ) measures beliefs, experiences and adherent behaviour on five-point Likert-type scales. Two hundred and eighty patients (53.3%) with a mean age of 71.1 years responded to the questionnaire. The 'beliefs' section had a two-factor solution-'confidence' and 'concerns' with internal consistencies of 0.82 and 0.45, respectively. The two domains identified from the section 'experiences'-satisfaction' and 'disappointment' had internal consistencies of 0.85 and 0.52, respectively. The 'behaviour' section, separately entitled the Tool for Adherence Behaviour Screening (TABS), had a two-factor solution--'adherence' and 'nonadherence', with internal consistencies of 0.80 and 0.59, respectively. All the domains demonstrated comparable reliabilities across two different patient populations. Their temporal stabilities ranged between 0.62 and 0.94.

CONCLUSION

The validity, reliability and utility of the BBQ and the TABS, a sub-scale of the BBQ that screens both intentional and unintentional nonadherence to pharmacological and non-pharmacological disease management, have been established.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The BBQ and the TABS have potential applications in screening adherence beliefs, experiences and behaviour in both clinical practice and research.

摘要

目的

开发并验证一份用于筛查慢性病患者潜在不依从性的问卷。

方法

将对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者进行定性访谈得出的主题用于问卷内容的开发。该问卷分发给525名患有慢性肺部疾病的门诊患者。进行主成分分析以确定问卷中的子量表。还对子量表的内部一致性、效度和稳定性进行了评估。

结果

这份包含30个条目的信念与行为问卷(BBQ)在五点李克特量表上测量信念、经历和依从行为。280名平均年龄为71.1岁的患者(53.3%)回复了问卷。“信念”部分有一个双因素解决方案——“信心”和“担忧”,内部一致性分别为0.82和0.45。从“经历”部分确定的两个领域——“满意度”和“失望”,内部一致性分别为0.85和0.52。“行为”部分单独命名为依从行为筛查工具(TABS),有一个双因素解决方案——“依从”和“不依从”,内部一致性分别为0.80和0.59。所有领域在两个不同患者群体中表现出可比的信度。它们的时间稳定性在0.62至0.94之间。

结论

已证实BBQ以及作为BBQ子量表的TABS的效度、信度和实用性,TABS可筛查对药物和非药物疾病管理的有意和无意不依从情况。

实践意义

BBQ和TABS在临床实践和研究中筛查依从信念、经历和行为方面具有潜在应用价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验