• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

职业健康服务中腰痛的循证生物心理社会管理培训评估:一项整群随机试验方案

Evaluation of training in guideline-oriented biopsychosocial management of low back pain in occupational health services: Protocol of a cluster randomized trial.

作者信息

Karppinen Jaro, Simula Anna Sofia, Holopainen Riikka, Lausmaa Mikko, Remes Jouko, Paukkunen Maija, Ussing Kasper, Booth Neill, Ryynänen Katja, Koski Tomi, Abbott Allan, Öberg Birgitta, Linton Steven J, Smith Anne, O'Sullivan Peter, Malmivaara Antti

机构信息

Medical Research Center Oulu Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu Oulu Finland.

Finnish Institute of Occupational Health Oulu Finland.

出版信息

Health Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 4;4(1):e251. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.251. eCollection 2021 Mar.

DOI:10.1002/hsr2.251
PMID:33728382
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7933561/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To prevent low back pain (LBP) from developing into a prolonged disabling condition, clinical guidelines advocate early stage assessment, risk-screening, and tailored interventions. Occupational health services recommend guideline-oriented biopsychosocial screening and individualized assessment and management. However, it is not known whether training a limited number of health care professionals improves the management process. The primary objective of this study is to investigate whether training in the biopsychosocial practice model is effective in reducing disability. Furthermore, we aim to evaluate health-economic impacts of the training intervention in comparison to usual medical care.

METHODS

The occupational health service units will be allocated into a training or control arm in a two-arm cluster randomized controlled design. The training of occupational physiotherapists and physicians will include the assessment of pain-related psychosocial factors using the STarT Back Tool and the short version of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire, the use of an evidence-based patient education booklet as part of the management of LBP, and tailored individualized management of LBP according to risk stratification. The control units will receive no training. The study population will include patients aged 18-65 with nonspecific LBP. The primary outcome is a patient-reported Oswestry Disability Index from baseline to 12 months. By estimating group differences over time, we aim to evaluate the effectiveness of the training intervention in comparison to usual medical care, and to undertake an economic evaluation using individual patients' health care records (participant-level data) and the participating units' registries (cluster-level data). In addition, through interviews and questionnaires, we will explore the health care professionals' conceptions of the adoption of, the barriers to, and the facilitators of the implementation of the practice model.

DISCUSSION

The evaluation of training in the guideline-oriented biopsychosocial management of LBP in occupational health services is justified because LBP represents an enormous burden in terms of work disability.

摘要

背景

为防止腰痛(LBP)发展为长期致残状况,临床指南提倡进行早期评估、风险筛查和针对性干预。职业健康服务机构推荐以指南为导向的生物心理社会筛查以及个体化评估与管理。然而,尚不清楚培训数量有限的医疗保健专业人员是否能改善管理流程。本研究的主要目的是调查生物心理社会实践模式培训在减少残疾方面是否有效。此外,我们旨在评估与常规医疗护理相比,该培训干预措施对健康经济的影响。

方法

职业健康服务单位将通过双臂整群随机对照设计分配到培训组或对照组。对职业物理治疗师和医生的培训将包括使用STarT Back工具和Örebro肌肉骨骼疼痛筛查问卷简版评估与疼痛相关的心理社会因素,使用基于证据的患者教育手册作为腰痛管理的一部分,以及根据风险分层对腰痛进行针对性的个体化管理。对照组将不接受培训。研究人群将包括年龄在18 - 65岁的非特异性腰痛患者。主要结局是患者报告的从基线到12个月的奥斯威斯残疾指数。通过估计随时间的组间差异,我们旨在评估与常规医疗护理相比培训干预措施的有效性,并使用个体患者的医疗保健记录(参与者层面的数据)和参与单位的登记册(整群层面的数据)进行经济评估。此外,通过访谈和问卷调查,我们将探讨医疗保健专业人员对实践模式采用情况、实施障碍和促进因素的看法。

讨论

对职业健康服务中以指南为导向的腰痛生物心理社会管理培训进行评估是合理的,因为腰痛在工作残疾方面构成了巨大负担。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f4e/7933561/43551f899deb/HSR2-4-e251-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f4e/7933561/0cbe43c24ede/HSR2-4-e251-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f4e/7933561/43551f899deb/HSR2-4-e251-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f4e/7933561/0cbe43c24ede/HSR2-4-e251-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f4e/7933561/43551f899deb/HSR2-4-e251-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of training in guideline-oriented biopsychosocial management of low back pain in occupational health services: Protocol of a cluster randomized trial.职业健康服务中腰痛的循证生物心理社会管理培训评估:一项整群随机试验方案
Health Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 4;4(1):e251. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.251. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
Effectiveness of training in guideline-oriented biopsychosocial management of low-back pain in occupational health services - a cluster randomized controlled trial.培训在职业健康服务中对下腰痛进行以指南为导向的生物心理社会管理的效果 - 一项集群随机对照试验。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2021 Jul 1;47(5):367-376. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3959. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
The Fear Reduction Exercised Early (FREE) approach to low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.早期恐惧减轻运动(FREE)治疗腰痛方法:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Oct 17;18(1):484. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2225-8.
5
A classification-based approach to low back pain in primary care - protocol for a benchmarking controlled trial.基于分类的初级保健下腰痛方法-基准对照试验方案。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Apr 6;21(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01135-8.
6
Cost-effectiveness of a multifaceted implementation strategy for the Dutch multidisciplinary guideline for nonspecific low back pain: design of a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial.荷兰非特异性下腰痛多学科指南多方面实施策略的成本效益:阶梯楔形整群随机对照试验设计
BMC Public Health. 2015 May 31;15:522. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1876-1.
7
8
The Fear Reduction Exercised Early (FREE) approach to management of low back pain in general practice: A pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial.基层医疗中运用早期锻炼减少恐惧(FREE)方法治疗腰痛:一项实用的聚类随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2019 Sep 9;16(9):e1002897. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002897. eCollection 2019 Sep.
9
Effectiveness of coordinated care to reduce the risk of prolonged disability among patients suffering from subacute or recurrent acute low back pain in primary care: protocol of the CO.LOMB cluster-randomized, controlled study.在初级保健中,协调护理对降低亚急性或复发性急性下背痛患者长期残疾风险的有效性:CO.LOMB 整群随机对照研究方案
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jun 20;10:1156482. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1156482. eCollection 2023.
10
Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of a Stratified Blended Physiotherapy Intervention Compared With Face-to-Face Physiotherapy in Patients With Nonspecific Low Back Pain: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.分层混合物理治疗干预与面对面物理治疗对非特异性腰痛患者的疗效和成本效益比较:集群随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 24;25:e43034. doi: 10.2196/43034.

引用本文的文献

1
Capabilities, opportunities and motivations in implementing guideline-oriented biopsychosocial low back pain management: perceptions of occupational healthcare professionals after an educational intervention.实施以指南为导向的生物心理社会腰痛管理的能力、机会和动机:教育干预后职业健康专业人员的看法
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Aug 29;25(1):1153. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13267-7.
2
Cost analysis comparing guideline-oriented biopsychosocial management to usual care for low-back pain: a cluster-randomized trial in occupational health primary care.比较以指南为导向的生物心理社会管理与腰痛常规护理的成本分析:职业健康初级护理中的一项整群随机试验
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2025 May;51(3):201-213. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4212. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Association of STarT Back Tool and the short form of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire with multidimensional risk factors.STarT 后背工具与 Örebro 肌肉骨骼疼痛筛查问卷短表与多维风险因素的关联。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 14;10(1):290. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-57105-3.
2
Transcultural adaption and preliminary evaluation of "understanding low back pain" patient education booklet.跨文化调适及“理解下背痛”患者教育手册的初步评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec 30;19(1):1010. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4854-y.
3
Using behaviour change theory and preliminary testing to develop an implementation intervention to reduce imaging for low back pain.
Effectiveness of training in guideline-oriented biopsychosocial management of low-back pain in occupational health services - a cluster randomized controlled trial.培训在职业健康服务中对下腰痛进行以指南为导向的生物心理社会管理的效果 - 一项集群随机对照试验。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2021 Jul 1;47(5):367-376. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3959. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
运用行为改变理论和初步测试来开发一种实施干预措施,以减少针对腰痛的影像学检查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Sep 24;18(1):734. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3526-7.
4
A focus group study to understand biases and confounders in a cluster randomized controlled trial on low back pain in primary care in Norway.一项焦点小组研究,旨在了解挪威初级保健中关于腰痛的整群随机对照试验中的偏差和混杂因素。
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 May 22;19(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0759-9.
5
Prevention and treatment of low back pain: evidence, challenges, and promising directions.预防和治疗下腰痛:证据、挑战和有前途的方向。
Lancet. 2018 Jun 9;391(10137):2368-2383. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30489-6. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
6
Low back pain: a call for action.下背痛:行动的呼吁。
Lancet. 2018 Jun 9;391(10137):2384-2388. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30488-4. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
7
What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention.什么是下背痛以及为什么我们需要关注它。
Lancet. 2018 Jun 9;391(10137):2356-2367. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30480-X. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
8
Construct validity and reliability of Finnish version of Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire.奥雷布洛肌肉骨骼疼痛筛查问卷芬兰语版的结构效度和信度
Scand J Pain. 2016 Oct;13:148-153. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
9
A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems.运用行为改变理论领域框架调查实施问题指南。
Implement Sci. 2017 Jun 21;12(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0605-9.
10
Can screening instruments accurately determine poor outcome risk in adults with recent onset low back pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis.筛查工具能否准确判定近期出现腰痛的成年人预后不良风险?一项系统评价与Meta分析。
BMC Med. 2017 Jan 19;15(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0774-4.