Suppr超能文献

红细胞中一氧化氮水平的测定:经酸-磺胺预处理的基于三碘化物的化学发光法的验证

Measurement of nitric oxide levels in the red cell: validation of tri-iodide-based chemiluminescence with acid-sulfanilamide pretreatment.

作者信息

Wang Xunde, Bryan Nathan S, MacArthur Peter H, Rodriguez Juan, Gladwin Mark T, Feelisch Martin

机构信息

Whitaker Cardiovascular Institute, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02118, USA.

出版信息

J Biol Chem. 2006 Sep 15;281(37):26994-7002. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M603953200. Epub 2006 Jul 14.

Abstract

The tri-iodide-based chemiluminescence assay is the most widely used methodology for the detection of S-nitrosothiols (RSNOs) in biological samples. Because of the low RSNO levels detected in a number of biological compartments using this assay, criticism has been raised that this method underestimates the true values in biological samples. This claim is based on the beliefs that (i) acidified sulfanilamide pretreatment, required to remove nitrite, leads to RSNO degradation and (ii) that there is auto-capture of released NO by heme in the reaction vessel. Because our laboratories have used this assay extensively without ever encountering evidence that corroborated these claims, we sought to experimentally address these issues using several independent techniques. We find that RSNOs of glutathione, cysteine, albumin, and hemoglobin are stable in acidified sulfanilamide as determined by the tri-iodide method, copper/cysteine assay, Griess-Saville assay and spectrophotometric analysis. Quantitatively there was no difference in S-nitroso-hemoglobin (SNOHb) or S-nitroso-albumin (SNOAlb) using the tri-iodide method and a recently described modified assay using a ferricyanide-enhanced reaction mix at biologically relevant NO:heme ratios. Levels of SNOHb detected in human blood ranged from 20-100 nM with no arterial-venous gradient. We further find that 90% of the total NO-related signal in blood is caused by erythrocytic nitrite, which may partly be bound to hemoglobin. We conclude that all claims made thus far that the tri-iodide assay underestimates RSNO levels are unsubstantiated and that this assay remains the "gold standard" for sensitive and specific measurement of RSNOs in biological matrices.

摘要

基于三碘化物的化学发光分析法是检测生物样品中S-亚硝基硫醇(RSNOs)最广泛使用的方法。由于使用该方法在许多生物区室中检测到的RSNO水平较低,有人提出批评,认为该方法低估了生物样品中的真实值。这一说法基于以下观点:(i)去除亚硝酸盐所需的酸化磺胺预处理会导致RSNO降解;(ii)反应容器中的血红素会自动捕获释放的NO。由于我们的实验室广泛使用该方法,但从未遇到过证实这些说法的证据,因此我们试图使用几种独立技术通过实验解决这些问题。我们发现,通过三碘化物法、铜/半胱氨酸法、格里斯-萨维尔法和分光光度分析确定,谷胱甘肽、半胱氨酸、白蛋白和血红蛋白的RSNOs在酸化磺胺中是稳定的。在生物学相关的NO:血红素比例下,使用三碘化物法和最近描述的使用铁氰化物增强反应混合物的改良分析法,S-亚硝基血红蛋白(SNOHb)或S-亚硝基白蛋白(SNOAlb)在定量上没有差异。在人体血液中检测到的SNOHb水平范围为20-100 nM,没有动静脉梯度。我们进一步发现,血液中与NO相关的总信号的90%是由红细胞亚硝酸盐引起的,红细胞亚硝酸盐可能部分与血红蛋白结合。我们得出结论,迄今为止所有关于三碘化物分析法低估RSNO水平的说法都是没有根据的,并且该分析法仍然是生物基质中RSNOs灵敏和特异性测量的“金标准”。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验