Bunde James, Suls Jerry
Department of Psychology, University of Iowa, Spence Labs, Iowa City, Iowa 52242-1407, USA.
Health Psychol. 2006 Jul;25(4):493-500. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.25.4.493.
One possible explanation for the association between Cook-Medley Hostility Scale (Ho Scale; W. W. Cook & D. M. Medley, 1954) scores and premature coronary artery disease (CAD) morbidity and mortality is that hostile persons also have elevations on CAD risk factors. Meta-analyses with fixed and random-effects models were used to evaluate the relationship between Ho Scale scores and CAD risk factors in the empirical literature. Ho Scale scores were significantly related to body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, insulin resistance, lipid ratio, triglycerides, glucose, socioeconomic status (SES), alcohol consumption, and smoking. Although there was also heterogeneity among study outcomes, the results of conservative random effects models provide confidence in the obtained relationships. On the basis of available evidence, researchers might give attention to obesity, insulin resistance, damaging health behaviors, and SES as potential contributing factors in understanding the association between Ho Scale scores and CAD.
库克-梅德利敌意量表(Ho量表;W.W.库克和D.M.梅德利,1954年)得分与冠状动脉疾病(CAD)过早发病和死亡之间存在关联,一种可能的解释是,怀有敌意的人在CAD风险因素方面也有升高。采用固定效应模型和随机效应模型的荟萃分析来评估实证文献中Ho量表得分与CAD风险因素之间的关系。Ho量表得分与体重指数、腰臀比、胰岛素抵抗、血脂比值、甘油三酯、血糖、社会经济地位(SES)、饮酒和吸烟显著相关。尽管研究结果之间也存在异质性,但保守随机效应模型的结果为所获得的关系提供了可信度。根据现有证据,研究人员在理解Ho量表得分与CAD之间的关联时,可能会关注肥胖、胰岛素抵抗、损害健康的行为以及SES等潜在促成因素。