Castellano C, Cestari V, Cabib S, Puglisi-Allegra S
Istituto di Psicobiologia e Psicofarmacologia CNR, Roma, Italy.
Behav Neural Biol. 1991 Nov;56(3):283-91. doi: 10.1016/0163-1047(91)90439-w.
Post-training administration of the selective D1 and D2 agonists SKF 38393 and LY 171555 dose-dependently facilitated retention of an inhibitory avoidance response in mice, while the selective D1 or D2 antagonists SCH 23390 and (-)sulpiride produced an impairment of retention. These effects are not to be ascribed to a nonspecific action of the drugs on retention performance, as the latencies during the retention test of those mice that had not received a footshock during the training were not increased by the post-training drug administration. The effects on retention performance induced by DA agonists and antagonists seem to be due to an effect on memory consolidation, since they have been observed when drugs were given at short, but not at long, periods of time after training. These results showing a similar role of D1 and D2 receptor types on memory storage appear not to be consistent with a body of neuropharmacological, neurophysiological, and behavioral evidence pointing to a different functional role of these types of DA receptors. This discrepancy is discussed in terms of possible involvement of different brain systems, peripheral systems, or possible second messenger processes activated by the two receptor types and leading to similar effects on memory processes.
训练后给予选择性D1和D2激动剂SKF 38393和LY 171555可剂量依赖性地促进小鼠抑制性回避反应的记忆保持,而选择性D1或D2拮抗剂SCH 23390和(-)舒必利则损害记忆保持。这些效应不应归因于药物对记忆保持表现的非特异性作用,因为在训练期间未接受电击的小鼠在记忆测试中的潜伏期并未因训练后给予药物而延长。多巴胺激动剂和拮抗剂对记忆保持表现的影响似乎是由于对记忆巩固的作用,因为当在训练后短时间而非长时间给予药物时观察到了这些效应。这些结果表明D1和D2受体类型在记忆存储中具有相似作用,这似乎与大量神经药理学、神经生理学和行为学证据不一致,这些证据表明这两种类型的多巴胺受体具有不同的功能作用。本文从不同脑系统、外周系统可能的参与,或两种受体类型激活的可能第二信使过程及其对记忆过程产生类似影响的角度讨论了这种差异。