Perry Mark C, Carville Serena F, Smith I Christopher H, Rutherford Olga M, Newham Di J
Division of Applied Biomedical Research, School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, King's College London, 3.1 Shepherd's House, Guy's Campus, London, SE1 1UL, UK.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007 Jul;100(5):553-61. doi: 10.1007/s00421-006-0247-0. Epub 2006 Jul 18.
Risk factors for medically unexplained falls may include reduced muscle power, strength and asymmetry in the lower limbs. Conflicting reports exist about strength and there is little information about power and symmetry. Forty-four healthy young people (29.3 +/- 0.6 years), 44 older non-fallers (75.9 +/- 0.6 years), and 34 older fallers (76.4 +/- 0.8 years) were studied. Isometric, concentric and eccentric strength of the knee and ankle muscles and leg extension power were measured bilaterally. The younger group was stronger in all muscles and types of contraction than both older groups (P < 0.02-0.0001). Strength differences between the older groups occasionally reached significance in individual muscles and types of contraction but overall the fallers had 85% of the strength and 79% of the power of the non-fallers (P < 0.001). Young subjects generated more power than both older groups (P < 0.0001) and the fallers generated less than the non-fallers (P = 0.03). Strength symmetry showed an inconsistent age effect in some muscles and some contraction types. This was similar overall in the two older groups. Both older groups had greater asymmetry in power than the young (P < 0.02-0.004). Power asymmetry tended to be greater in the fallers than the non-fallers but this did not reach significance. These data do not support the suggestion that asymmetry of strength and power are associated with either increasing age or fall history. Power output showed clear differences between age groups and fall status and appears to be the most relevant measurement of fall risk and highlights the cumulative effects on function of small changes in strength in individual muscle groups.
医学上不明原因跌倒的风险因素可能包括下肢肌肉力量、强度和不对称性降低。关于力量的报道存在矛盾,而关于力量和对称性的信息很少。对44名健康年轻人(29.3±0.6岁)、44名老年非跌倒者(75.9±0.6岁)和34名老年跌倒者(76.4±0.8岁)进行了研究。双侧测量了膝关节和踝关节肌肉的等长、向心和离心力量以及腿部伸展力量。年轻组在所有肌肉和收缩类型方面都比两个老年组更强(P<0.02 - 0.0001)。老年组之间在个别肌肉和收缩类型上的力量差异偶尔具有显著性,但总体而言,跌倒者的力量为非跌倒者的85%,力量为非跌倒者的79%(P<0.001)。年轻受试者产生的力量比两个老年组都多(P<0.0001),而跌倒者产生的力量比非跌倒者少(P = 0.03)。力量对称性在某些肌肉和某些收缩类型中显示出不一致的年龄效应。在两个老年组中总体情况相似。两个老年组在力量方面的不对称性都比年轻人更大(P<0.02 - 0.004)。跌倒者的力量不对称性往往比非跌倒者更大,但未达到显著性。这些数据不支持力量和力量不对称与年龄增长或跌倒史相关的观点。力量输出在年龄组和跌倒状态之间显示出明显差异,似乎是跌倒风险最相关的测量指标,并突出了个别肌肉群力量微小变化对功能的累积影响。