Binion G
Department of Political Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.
Int J Law Policy Family. 1997;11(1):63-85. doi: 10.1093/lawfam/11.1.63.
The research presented below analyses the rhetoric of abortion jurisprudence from the perspective of fundamental principles of feminist theory. While focused primarily on the American experience, it addresses and raises questions that are on the political agenda in a significant number of contemporary societies. The feminist principles identified, and against which judicial rhetoric is assessed, include: the importance of actual life experience over abstract principles, the significance of the distinction between the public and private realms and the understanding of society as a web of relationships. Demonstrated by the relevant data is that the decisions of the judiciary restrictive of reproductive choice are characterized by a distinctly non-feminist rhetoric.
以下呈现的研究从女权主义理论的基本原则视角分析了堕胎法理学的言辞。虽然主要聚焦于美国的情况,但它探讨并提出了当代众多社会政治议程上的问题。所确定的、用以评估司法言辞的女权主义原则包括:实际生活经验优于抽象原则的重要性、公共领域与私人领域区分的意义以及将社会理解为关系网络。相关数据表明,限制生殖选择的司法裁决具有明显非女权主义的言辞特征。