Taylor Robert W, O'Brien Jacklyn, Trottier Steven J, Manganaro Lisa, Cytron Margaret, Lesko Mary F, Arnzen Kimberly, Cappadoro Carla, Fu Min, Plisco Michael S, Sadaka Farid G, Veremakis Christopher
St. John's Mercy Medical Center, St. Louis University, MO, USA.
Crit Care Med. 2006 Sep;34(9):2302-8; quiz 2309. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000234034.51040.7F.
A previous retrospective evaluation of Project Impact data demonstrated an association between red blood cell transfusions, nosocomial infections, and poorer outcomes in critically ill patients, independent of survival probability or patient age. The objective of this study was to determine whether transfused patients, independent of survival probability based on Mortality Prediction Model scores, have higher nosocomial infection rates, longer intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay, and higher mortality rates than nontransfused patients.
Prospective, observational, cohort study.
A single-center, mixed medical/surgical, closed intensive care unit.
: Adults admitted to St. John's Mercy Medical Center between August 2001 and June 2003 (n = 2,085) were enrolled using Project Impact software. Both nonoperative and postoperative populations were represented, and transfusion decisions were made independently of patient study inclusion. Patients whose nosocomial infection was diagnosed before transfusion were counted as nontransfused.
: None.
Nosocomial infections, mortality rates, and intensive care unit and hospital length of stay were the main outcome measures. Of the 2,085 patients enrolled, 21.5% received red blood cell transfusions. The posttransfusion nosocomial infection rate was 14.3% in 428 evaluable patients, significantly higher than that observed in nontransfused patients (5.8%; p < .0001, chi-square). In a multivariate analysis controlling for patient age, maximum storage age of red blood cells, and number of red blood cell transfusions, only the number of transfusions was independently associated with nosocomial infection (odds ratio 1.097; 95% confidence interval 1.028-1.171; p = .005). When corrected for survival probability, the risk of nosocomial infection associated with red blood cell transfusions remained statistically significant (p < .0001). Leukoreduction tended to reduce the nosocomial infection rate but not significantly. Mortality and length of stay (intensive care unit and hospital) were significantly higher in transfused patients, even when corrected for illness severity.
Red blood cell transfusions should be used sparingly, bearing in mind the potential risks of infection and poor outcomes in critically ill patients.
先前对“影响项目”数据的回顾性评估表明,在重症患者中,红细胞输血、医院感染与较差的预后之间存在关联,且不受生存概率或患者年龄的影响。本研究的目的是确定接受输血的患者,无论基于死亡率预测模型评分的生存概率如何,与未输血患者相比,是否具有更高的医院感染率、更长的重症监护病房和住院时间以及更高的死亡率。
前瞻性观察队列研究。
单中心、内科/外科混合的封闭式重症监护病房。
使用“影响项目”软件纳入了2001年8月至2003年6月期间入住圣约翰慈悲医疗中心的成人患者(n = 2085)。纳入了非手术患者和术后患者,输血决策独立于患者是否纳入研究。在输血前被诊断为医院感染的患者被计为未输血患者。
无。
医院感染、死亡率以及重症监护病房和住院时间是主要的观察指标。在纳入的2085例患者中,21.5%接受了红细胞输血。428例可评估患者输血后的医院感染率为14.3%,显著高于未输血患者(5.8%;p <.0001,卡方检验)。在对患者年龄、红细胞最大储存年龄和红细胞输血量进行多因素分析时,只有输血量与医院感染独立相关(比值比1.097;95%置信区间1.028 - 1.171;p =.005)。校正生存概率后,与红细胞输血相关的医院感染风险仍具有统计学意义(p <.0001)。白细胞滤除倾向于降低医院感染率,但无显著差异。即使校正了疾病严重程度,输血患者的死亡率和住院时间(重症监护病房和住院)仍显著更高。
鉴于重症患者存在感染风险和不良预后的可能性,应谨慎使用红细胞输血。