Suppr超能文献

家禽灌注肠段中己糖和戊糖在体内的吸收。

Absorption of hexose and pentose sugars in vivo in perfused intestinal segments in the fowl.

作者信息

Savory C J, Mitchell M A

机构信息

AFRC Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics Research, Edinburgh Research Station, Roslin, U.K.

出版信息

Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol. 1991;100(4):969-74. doi: 10.1016/0300-9629(91)90324-6.

Abstract
  1. Rates of absorption of two hexose (D-glucose and D-galactose) and two pentose (D-xylose and D-arabinose) sugars were measured by in vivo perfusion, in jejunum, ileum and (distal) caecum, in immature hens conditioned to either a standard (ST) or "high fibre" (ST + 20% grass) diet. 2. Each bird was tested in one intestinal segment with all four (U-14C-labelled, 10 mM) sugars, with either the hexoses preceding the pentoses or vice versa. 3. With all treatments, absorption rates of the hexoses were alike, as were those of the pentoses. Hexose absorption was twice as fast as pentose absorption in jejunum and ileum with both dietary pretreatments, whereas in caecum hexose and pentose rates were similarly high, except when pentose (and its associated fluid transfer) was apparently inhibited by prior hexose absorption with the ST diet. 4. With the ST diet, hexose absorption (per unit length and dry weight) was faster in caecum than in jejunum and ileum, and pentose absorption was also fastest in caecum when all pentose data from testing after hexose were excluded. 5. With the ST/grass diet, hexose absorption was faster in jejunum than in ileum and caecum when expressed per unit length, and pentose absorption was fastest in caecum on a dry weight basis. 6. Hexose absorption was faster in jejunum and slower in caecum with the ST/grass pretreatment than with ST. However, the dietary comparison was not conclusive because it involved birds form (two) different hatches (of similar age and weight) tested at different times.
摘要
  1. 通过体内灌注法,在未成熟母鸡的空肠、回肠和(远端)盲肠中,测量了两种己糖(D-葡萄糖和D-半乳糖)和两种戊糖(D-木糖和D-阿拉伯糖)的吸收速率。这些母鸡分别以标准(ST)或“高纤维”(ST + 20% 草粉)日粮饲养。2. 每只鸡在一个肠段中用所有四种(U-14C标记,10 mM)糖进行测试,己糖在前或戊糖在前。3. 在所有处理中,己糖的吸收速率相似,戊糖的吸收速率也相似。在两种日粮预处理下,空肠和回肠中己糖的吸收速度是戊糖的两倍,而在盲肠中,己糖和戊糖的吸收速率同样高,除非在ST日粮中,先前的己糖吸收明显抑制了戊糖(及其相关的液体转运)。4. 对于ST日粮,盲肠中己糖的吸收(每单位长度和干重)比空肠和回肠更快,当排除己糖测试后所有戊糖数据时,戊糖在盲肠中的吸收也最快。5. 对于ST/草粉日粮,以单位长度表示时,空肠中己糖的吸收比回肠和盲肠更快,以干重为基础时,戊糖在盲肠中的吸收最快。6. 与ST预处理相比,ST/草粉预处理使空肠中己糖吸收更快,盲肠中更慢。然而,日粮比较并不具有决定性,因为它涉及来自(两)批不同孵化(年龄和体重相似)的鸡在不同时间进行测试。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验