Tutin C E, Fernandez M, Rogers M E, Williamson E A, McGrew W C
Centre International de Recherches Médicales de Franceville, Gabon.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1991 Nov 29;334(1270):179-85; discussion 185-6. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1991.0107.
Comparison of the diets of sympatric gorillas and chimpanzees allows an analysis of niche separation between these two closely related species. Qualitatively, their diets are similar, being dominated by an equally diverse array of fruit species complemented with vegetative plant parts, seeds and insects. Gorillas eat more vegetative plant parts than do chimpanzees, but niche separation is most obvious in periods of fruit scarcity when the two species show different strategies that reduce competition for food. Their abilities to overcome mechanical and physical plant defences appear to differ, as gorillas are able to subsist entirely on abundant vegetative foods. Chimpanzees show social adjustment, foraging alone or in small groups, to reduce intra-specific competition for scarce fruit resources. Thus it seems that subtle physiological differences have far-reaching repercussions, defining potential evolutionary pathways for social organization and allowing sufficient niche separation between species.
对同域分布的大猩猩和黑猩猩的饮食进行比较,可以分析这两个亲缘关系密切的物种之间的生态位分离情况。从定性角度来看,它们的饮食相似,主要由种类同样丰富的水果构成,辅以植物的营养部分、种子和昆虫。大猩猩食用的植物营养部分比黑猩猩多,但生态位分离在水果稀缺时期最为明显,此时这两个物种会采取不同策略以减少对食物的竞争。它们克服植物机械和物理防御的能力似乎有所不同,因为大猩猩能够完全依靠丰富的植物性食物生存。黑猩猩则表现出社会适应性,独自或小群体觅食,以减少对稀缺水果资源的种内竞争。因此,看似细微的生理差异具有深远影响,决定了社会组织的潜在进化途径,并使物种之间有足够的生态位分离。