Crabtree Eric C, Beck Marc, Lopp Brian R, Nosovitch Mace, Edwards John N, Boezaart André P
Regional Anesthesia Study Center of Iowa, Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006 Jul-Aug;31(4):358-62. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2006.03.005.
The subgluteal approach is common for sciatic nerve block. Although the surface landmarks are clear, the depth of this nerve at this level is difficult to judge. The purpose of this study is to establish a method of estimating the sciatic nerve depth using the anteroposterior (AP) diameter of the thigh as a marker.
The study was undertaken in 2 phases. Phase 1 entailed review of 100 magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of the pelvis and proximal lower extremity of patients. Measurements were taken of the AP diameter of the thigh at the midpoint of the lesser trochanter and then compared with distances of the sciatic nerves from the skin of the posterior aspect of the thigh at the same level. Phase 2 involved enrolling 40 patients undergoing lower-extremity surgery for whom subgluteal sciatic nerve blocks were indicated. The AP diameters of the thighs were measured from the subgluteal groove to the inguinal groove with the patient in the supine position. Placing the patient in the lateral position, the subgluteal sciatic block was then performed by using a stimulating needle. The distances from the skin at which the sciatic nerves were actually found, as estimated by maximum motor response to stimulus, were noted.
Phase 1 showed a mean AP diameter of 18.94 cm +/- 2.61 cm (mean +/- standard deviation [SD]), mean nerve depth of 6.51 cm +/- 1.46 cm (mean +/- SD), and a linear regression slope of 0.48. Phase 2 showed a mean AP diameter of 16.28 cm +/- 2.73 cm (mean +/- SD), a mean nerve depth of 6.99 cm +/- 1.39 cm (mean +/- SD), and a linear regression slope of 0.43. The thigh diameters differed (P < .001) between the groups, but there was no difference in the depth to the sciatic nerve between the 2 groups (P = .07).
Comparing phase 1 and phase 2 datasets shows the slopes of linear regression lines are nearly parallel. The clinical data from phase 2 verify the anatomical data collected in phase 1 and show that the sciatic nerve depth to AP diameter ratio is 0.43 or the depth of the sciatic nerve is approximately 43% of thigh diameter if the patient is positioned in the lateral decubitus position.
臀下入路常用于坐骨神经阻滞。尽管体表标志清晰,但该水平坐骨神经的深度难以判断。本研究的目的是建立一种以大腿前后径(AP)为标记来估算坐骨神经深度的方法。
本研究分两个阶段进行。第一阶段对100例患者骨盆及下肢近端的磁共振成像(MRI)进行回顾。测量小转子中点处大腿的前后径,然后与同一水平大腿后侧皮肤至坐骨神经的距离进行比较。第二阶段纳入40例拟行下肢手术且需行臀下坐骨神经阻滞的患者。患者仰卧位时,测量从臀下沟至腹股沟沟的大腿前后径。患者侧卧位后,使用刺激针进行臀下坐骨神经阻滞。记录通过对刺激的最大运动反应估计实际找到坐骨神经处距皮肤的距离。
第一阶段显示大腿前后径平均为18.94 cm±2.61 cm(均值±标准差[SD]),神经平均深度为6.51 cm±1.46 cm(均值±SD),线性回归斜率为0.48。第二阶段显示大腿前后径平均为16.28 cm±2.73 cm(均值±SD),神经平均深度为6.99 cm±1.39 cm(均值±SD),线性回归斜率为0.43。两组间大腿直径不同(P <.001),但两组间至坐骨神经的深度无差异(P = 0.07)。
比较第一阶段和第二阶段数据集显示线性回归线的斜率几乎平行。第二阶段的临床数据验证了第一阶段收集的解剖学数据,并表明如果患者处于侧卧位,坐骨神经深度与前后径之比为0.43,即坐骨神经深度约为大腿直径的43%。