Suppr超能文献

臀后入路阻滞坐骨神经:技术描述及初步临床经验

Posterior subgluteal approach to block the sciatic nerve: description of the technique and initial clinical experiences.

作者信息

Di Benedetto P, Casati A, Bertini L, Fanelli G

机构信息

CTO Roma, Department of Anaesthesiology, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2002 Sep;19(9):682-6. doi: 10.1017/s0265021502001126.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

A new posterior approach to the sciatic nerve in the subgluteal region was developed. We describe our clinical experiences on 135 consecutive patients.

METHODS

All blocks were performed with a nerve stimulator (stimulation frequency 2 Hz; intensity from 1 reduced to < or = 0.5 mA before application). A line was drawn from the greater trochanter to the ischial tuberosity of the femur; then, from the mid-point of this line, a second line was drawn perpendicularly and extended caudally for 4 cm: the end of this line represented the entry point of the needle. Sciatic stimulation was elicited at < or = 0.5 mA; then ropivacaine 0.75% 20 mL was injected. An independent observer recorded the time from needle insertion to successful sciatic nerve stimulation (performance time), the depth of appropriate sciatic stimulation and the number of needle redirections, as well as the quality of nerve block, the discomfort during the procedure and patient acceptance.

RESULTS

The performance time was 41 +/- 25 s (mean +/- SD) and the mean (SD) depth at which the sciatic nerve stimulation was found was 45 +/- 10 mm. The median (range) number of needle redirections required to find the proper sciatic stimulation was 2 (1-5). The tibial response was observed in 77 patients (57%), while the common peroneal response was observed in 58 patients (43%). The degree of discomfort reported was very low and only 16 patients (12%) reported severe pain during placement of the block. The onset time (mean +/- SD) of sensory and motor block was 7 +/- 4 and 17 +/- 13 min respectively, and the surgical procedure was completed with only the peripheral nerve block in 127 patients (94%). The same anaesthesia procedure was acceptable by 127 patients (94%) and only eight patients (6%) would prefer a different anaesthesia technique in the future.

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrated that the sciatic nerve can be easily blocked using this new posterior subgluteal approach, suggesting that it represents a safe and effective alternative to block the sciatic nerve at a proximal level, with the potential for reducing the discomfort experienced by the patient during block placement.

摘要

背景与目的

开发了一种臀下区域坐骨神经阻滞的新后路方法。我们描述了连续135例患者的临床经验。

方法

所有阻滞均使用神经刺激器进行(刺激频率2Hz;应用前强度从1mA降至≤0.5mA)。从股骨大转子向坐骨结节画一条线;然后,从这条线的中点垂直画第二条线并向尾侧延伸4cm:这条线的终点代表进针点。在≤0.5mA时引出坐骨神经刺激;然后注入0.75%罗哌卡因20mL。一名独立观察者记录从进针到成功刺激坐骨神经的时间(操作时间)、合适的坐骨神经刺激深度和进针方向调整次数,以及神经阻滞质量、操作过程中的不适和患者接受度。

结果

操作时间为41±25秒(平均值±标准差),发现坐骨神经刺激的平均(标准差)深度为45±10mm。找到合适的坐骨神经刺激所需的进针方向调整次数中位数(范围)为2次(1 - 5次)。77例患者(57%)观察到胫神经反应,58例患者(43%)观察到腓总神经反应。报告的不适程度非常低,只有16例患者(12%)在阻滞放置过程中报告有剧痛。感觉和运动阻滞的起效时间(平均值±标准差)分别为7±4分钟和17±13分钟,127例患者(94%)仅通过周围神经阻滞完成了手术。127例患者(94%)接受相同的麻醉方法,只有8例患者(6%)未来会倾向于不同的麻醉技术。

结论

该研究表明,使用这种新的臀下后路方法可以轻松阻滞坐骨神经,这表明它是在近端水平阻滞坐骨神经的一种安全有效的替代方法,有可能减少患者在阻滞放置过程中所经历的不适。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验