Suppr超能文献

进展性慢性肾脏病患者的识别与转诊:一项全国性研究。

Identification and referral of patients with progressive CKD: a national study.

作者信息

Boulware L Ebony, Troll Misty U, Jaar Bernard G, Myers Donna I, Powe Neil R

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Am J Kidney Dis. 2006 Aug;48(2):192-204. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.04.073.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether primary care physicians (PCPs) and nephrologists differ in their recognition of progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD), agree on diagnostic and referral strategies, and identify similar barriers to caring for patients.

METHODS

We conducted a national study of PCPs and nephrologists in the United States through a questionnaire describing a PCP caring for a patient with progressing CKD and questions to assess recognition of kidney dysfunction and approaches to diagnostic evaluation and referral. We identified participant and patient characteristics independently associated with CKD recognition and referral.

RESULTS

We randomly identified a national sample of 304 physicians (126 nephrologists [39% response rate], 89 family physicians [28% response rate], and 89 general internists [28% response rate]). PCPs recognized CKD less (adjusted percentage, 59%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 47 to 69, family physicians; adjusted percentage, 78%; 95% CI, 67 to 86, general internists; adjusted percentage, 97%; 95% CI, 93 to 99, nephrologists; P < 0.01), differed from nephrologists in their recommendations for diagnostic testing, and recommended referral less (adjusted percentage, 76%; 95% CI, 65 to 84, family physicians; adjusted percentage, 81%; 95% CI, 70 to 89, general internists; adjusted percentage, 99%; 95% CI, 95 to 100, nephrologists; P < 0.01). PCPs differed from nephrologists in their expected intensity of specialists' involvement in care (16%, family physicians; 20%, general internists; 6%, nephrologists recommending nephrologist input monthly to every 6 months; P = 0.01). Lack of awareness of clinical practice guidelines and lack of clinical and administrative resources were identified as important barriers to care.

CONCLUSION

PCPs recognize and recommend specialist care for progressive CKD less than nephrologists and differ in their clinical evaluations and expectations for referral. Improved dissemination of existing guidelines and targeted education in conjunction with efforts to build consensus among PCPs and nephrologists regarding their roles in the care of patients with CKD, including the collaborative development of clinical practice guidelines, could enhance patient care.

摘要

背景

基层医疗医生(PCP)和肾病科医生在对进行性慢性肾脏病(CKD)的认知、诊断和转诊策略的共识以及识别患者护理的相似障碍方面是否存在差异尚不清楚。

方法

我们通过一份问卷对美国的基层医疗医生和肾病科医生进行了一项全国性研究,问卷描述了一位基层医疗医生对一名患有进展性CKD的患者的护理情况,并设置了评估肾功能障碍认知、诊断评估方法和转诊方法的问题。我们确定了与CKD认知和转诊独立相关的参与者和患者特征。

结果

我们随机抽取了一个全国性的304名医生样本(126名肾病科医生[回复率39%],89名家庭医生[回复率28%],89名普通内科医生[回复率28%])。基层医疗医生对CKD的认知较少(调整后百分比,家庭医生为59%;95%置信区间[CI],47至69;普通内科医生调整后百分比为78%;95%CI,67至86;肾病科医生调整后百分比为97%;95%CI,93至99;P<0.01),在诊断测试建议方面与肾病科医生不同,且转诊建议较少(调整后百分比,家庭医生为76%;95%CI,65至84;普通内科医生调整后百分比为81%;95%CI,70至89;肾病科医生调整后百分比为99%;95%CI,95至100;P<0.01)。基层医疗医生在预期专科医生参与护理的强度方面与肾病科医生不同(家庭医生为每月至每6个月有肾病科医生参与护理的建议比例为16%;普通内科医生为20%;肾病科医生为6%;P = 0.01)。缺乏对临床实践指南的认识以及缺乏临床和行政资源被确定为护理的重要障碍。

结论

基层医疗医生对进行性CKD的认知和推荐专科护理的比例低于肾病科医生,在临床评估和转诊期望方面也存在差异。改进现有指南的传播和针对性教育,同时努力在基层医疗医生和肾病科医生之间就他们在CKD患者护理中的作用达成共识,包括共同制定临床实践指南,可能会提高患者护理水平。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验