Suppr超能文献

外周动脉闭塞性疾病在血液透析患者中更为普遍:与多排螺旋计算机断层扫描结果的比较

Peripheral arterial occlusive disease is more prevalent in patients with hemodialysis: comparison with the findings of multidetector-row computed tomography.

作者信息

Okamoto Koji, Oka Machiko, Maesato Kyoko, Ikee Ryota, Mano Tsutomu, Moriya Hidekazu, Ohtake Takayasu, Kobayashi Shuzo

机构信息

Department of Nephrology and Kidney and Dialysis Center, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Japan.

出版信息

Am J Kidney Dis. 2006 Aug;48(2):269-76. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.04.075.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) influences the mortality of patients on hemodialysis therapy. Although the ankle-brachial pressure index (ABI) is used widely to detect PAOD, it yields false-negative results because of calcifications of vascular walls. To more accurately assess the prevalence of PAOD, we investigated which noninvasive method, among ABI, toe-brachial pressure index, transcutaneous Po(2), and skin perfusion pressure (SPP), had superior sensitivity and specificity to the others.

METHODS

Multidetector-row computed tomography was performed in 36 hemodialysis patients. We then compared the 4 noninvasive methods with findings of multidetector-row computed tomography and calculated the sensitivity and specificity of each method by means of receiver operating characteristic analysis. Irrespective of symptoms, PAOD is defined as the presence of complete obstruction in the case of lesions below the knee or more than 75% stenosis for lesions above the knee.

RESULTS

Seven of 36 patients (19.4%) had an ABI less than 0.9. Sensitivity of the ABI was only 29.9%, whereas an SPP set at 50 mm Hg was more accurate, with sensitivity of 84.9% and specificity of 76.9%. A total of 41.4% of patients had an SPP less than 50 mm Hg. For lesions located above the knee, toe-brachial pressure index provided sensitivity of 91.7% and specificity of 86.7%.

CONCLUSION

SPP is the most useful tool for detecting PAOD in hemodialysis patients, with accuracy of 84.9%. There is a strong possibility that more patients than previously expected have early PAOD.

摘要

背景

外周动脉闭塞性疾病(PAOD)影响接受血液透析治疗患者的死亡率。尽管踝肱压力指数(ABI)被广泛用于检测PAOD,但由于血管壁钙化,其会产生假阴性结果。为了更准确地评估PAOD的患病率,我们研究了在ABI、趾肱压力指数、经皮氧分压(Po₂)和皮肤灌注压(SPP)这几种非侵入性方法中,哪种方法相对于其他方法具有更高的敏感性和特异性。

方法

对36例血液透析患者进行了多排螺旋CT检查。然后,我们将这4种非侵入性方法与多排螺旋CT的检查结果进行比较,并通过受试者工作特征分析计算每种方法的敏感性和特异性。无论有无症状,PAOD的定义为:膝以下病变存在完全阻塞,或膝以上病变狭窄超过75%。

结果

36例患者中有7例(19.4%)ABI小于0.9。ABI的敏感性仅为29.9%,而将SPP设定为50 mmHg时更为准确,敏感性为84.9%,特异性为76.9%。共有41.4%的患者SPP小于50 mmHg。对于膝以上病变,趾肱压力指数的敏感性为91.7%,特异性为86.7%。

结论

SPP是检测血液透析患者PAOD最有用的工具,准确率为84.9%。很有可能有比之前预期更多的患者患有早期PAOD。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验