• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过与计算机断层血管造影术对比,对用于下肢动脉闭塞性疾病的踝臂指数自动示波测量法进行验证研究。

Validation study of automated oscillometric measurement of the ankle-brachial index for lower arterial occlusive disease by comparison with computed tomography angiography.

作者信息

Ichihashi Shigeo, Hashimoto Tomoko, Iwakoshi Shinichi, Kichikawa Kimihiko

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.

Product Development Strategy HQ Technology Development Department, Omron Healthcare Co, Ltd., Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

Hypertens Res. 2014 Jun;37(6):591-4. doi: 10.1038/hr.2014.34. Epub 2014 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1038/hr.2014.34
PMID:24599013
Abstract

The ankle-brachial index (ABI) determined by the oscillometric method has been shown to reliably detect peripheral arterial disease (PAD), with highly correlations with the Doppler method. However, most of these studies were shown in cohorts with a small number of PAD patients, and no imaging studies have been performed. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and optimal threshold of oscillometric ABI for detecting PAD using computed tomography angiography (CTA) as a gold standard in a cohort that consists mostly of PAD patients. This retrospective study included 108 consecutive patients with 216 limbs. ABI measured by an oscillometric device was compared with CTA. The diagnostic accuracy of oscillometric ABI to detect ≥50% and ≥75% stenosis confirmed by CTA and the optimal ABI cutoff values were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The oscillometric ABI could not be measured in nine limbs. The mean ABI was 0.72±0.31. The areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) for detecting ≥50% and ≥75% stenosis with oscillometric ABI were 0.919 and 0.918, respectively. The optimal ABI cutoff values to detect these levels of stenosis were 0.99 (sensitivity, 90%: specificity, 85%) and 0.87 (sensitivity, 84%: specificity, 89%), respectively. If patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) were analyzed separately, the AUC for detecting ≥75% stenosis was 0.888. Oscillometric ABI had a high diagnostic accuracy to detect PAD using CTA as a gold standard. The diagnostic ability of ABI to detect PAD could be impaired by the presence of DM.

摘要

示波法测定的踝臂指数(ABI)已被证明能可靠地检测外周动脉疾病(PAD),与多普勒法具有高度相关性。然而,这些研究大多在PAD患者数量较少的队列中进行,且未开展影像学研究。本研究的目的是在一个主要由PAD患者组成的队列中,以计算机断层血管造影(CTA)作为金标准,评估示波法ABI检测PAD的诊断准确性和最佳阈值。这项回顾性研究纳入了108例连续患者的216条肢体。将示波装置测量的ABI与CTA进行比较。使用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析评估示波法ABI检测CTA证实的≥50%和≥75%狭窄的诊断准确性以及最佳ABI临界值。九条肢体无法测量示波法ABI。平均ABI为0.72±0.31。示波法ABI检测≥50%和≥75%狭窄的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.919和0.918。检测这些狭窄程度的最佳ABI临界值分别为0.99(灵敏度90%:特异度85%)和0.87(灵敏度84%:特异度89%)。如果单独分析糖尿病(DM)患者,检测≥75%狭窄的AUC为0.888。以CTA作为金标准时,示波法ABI检测PAD具有较高的诊断准确性。DM的存在可能会损害ABI检测PAD的诊断能力。

相似文献

1
Validation study of automated oscillometric measurement of the ankle-brachial index for lower arterial occlusive disease by comparison with computed tomography angiography.通过与计算机断层血管造影术对比,对用于下肢动脉闭塞性疾病的踝臂指数自动示波测量法进行验证研究。
Hypertens Res. 2014 Jun;37(6):591-4. doi: 10.1038/hr.2014.34. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
2
Automated determination of the ankle-brachial index using an oscillometric blood pressure monitor: validation vs. Doppler measurement and cardiovascular risk factor profile.利用示波法血压计自动测定踝臂指数:与多普勒测量法和心血管危险因素分析的对比验证。
Hypertens Res. 2011 Jul;34(7):825-30. doi: 10.1038/hr.2011.53. Epub 2011 May 19.
3
Combination of pulse volume recording (PVR) parameters and ankle-brachial index (ABI) improves diagnostic accuracy for peripheral arterial disease compared with ABI alone.与单独使用踝臂指数(ABI)相比,脉搏容积记录(PVR)参数与踝臂指数(ABI)相结合可提高外周动脉疾病的诊断准确性。
Hypertens Res. 2016 Jun;39(6):430-4. doi: 10.1038/hr.2016.13. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
4
Diagnostic accuracy of automated oscillometric determination of the ankle-brachial index in peripheral artery disease.自动化示波法测定踝臂指数在周围动脉疾病中的诊断准确性。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Feb;73(2):652-660. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.05.077. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
5
Automated oscillometric measurement of the ankle-brachial index in patients with coronary artery disease.自动化示波法测量冠心病患者踝臂指数。
Hypertens Res. 2013 Jan;36(1):25-8. doi: 10.1038/hr.2012.120. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
6
Detection of peripheral arterial disease with an improved automated device: comparison of a new oscillometric device and the standard Doppler method.使用改进的自动化设备检测外周动脉疾病:新型示波装置与标准多普勒方法的比较。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2016 Jul 29;12:305-11. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S106534. eCollection 2016.
7
Factors affecting the validity of the oscillometric Ankle Brachial Index to detect peripheral arterial disease.影响示波法踝臂指数检测外周动脉疾病有效性的因素。
Int Angiol. 2017 Dec;36(6):536-544. doi: 10.23736/S0392-9590.17.03860-3. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
8
The accuracy of an oscillometric ankle-brachial index in the diagnosis of lower limb peripheral arterial disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.振荡式踝臂指数在诊断下肢外周动脉疾病中的准确性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int J Clin Pract. 2017 Sep;71(9). doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12994. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
9
Diagnostic Accuracy Study of an Oscillometric Ankle-Brachial Index in Peripheral Arterial Disease: The Influence of Oscillometric Errors and Calcified Legs.外周动脉疾病中振荡式踝臂指数的诊断准确性研究:振荡式误差和腿部钙化的影响
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 29;11(11):e0167408. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167408. eCollection 2016.
10
Automated oscillometric determination of the ankle-brachial index: a systematic review and meta-analysis.自动振荡法测定踝臂指数:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hypertens Res. 2012 Sep;35(9):883-91. doi: 10.1038/hr.2012.83. Epub 2012 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying Risk Factors for Lower Extremity Artery Disease (LEAD) in Cardiology Patients: The Role of Ankle-Brachial Index Measurement.识别心脏病患者下肢动脉疾病(LEAD)的危险因素:踝臂指数测量的作用。
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 23;13(24):7858. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247858.
2
Peripheral Arterial Disease prevalence and risk factors in the Eastern Caribbean Health Outcomes Research Network (ECHORN) cohort.东加勒比健康结局研究网络(ECHORN)队列中的外周动脉疾病患病率及相关风险因素。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 26;19(8):e0306918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306918. eCollection 2024.
3
Current Opinion on Diagnosis of Peripheral Artery Disease in Diabetic Patients.
糖尿病患者外周动脉疾病诊断的现状观点。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jul 20;60(7):1179. doi: 10.3390/medicina60071179.
4
Oscillometric measurement of the ankle-brachial index and the estimated carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity improves the sensitivity of an automated device in screening peripheral artery disease.通过示波法测量踝肱指数和估算颈动脉-股动脉脉搏波速度,可提高自动设备筛查外周动脉疾病的敏感性。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Dec 12;10:1275856. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1275856. eCollection 2023.
5
Screening for Peripheral Artery Disease Using an Automated Four-Limb Blood Pressure Monitor Equipped with Toe-Brachial Index Measurement.使用配备趾臂指数测量功能的自动四肢血压监测仪筛查外周动脉疾病
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 15;12(20):6539. doi: 10.3390/jcm12206539.
6
Central Systolic Blood Pressure as a Risk Factor for Accelerated Progression of Arterial Stiffness.中心收缩压是动脉僵硬度加速进展的一个危险因素。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2024 Feb 1;31(2):180-187. doi: 10.5551/jat.64228. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
7
Assessing Automatic Plethysmographic Ankle-Brachial Index Devices in Peripheral Artery Disease Detection: A Comparative Study with Doppler Ankle-Brachial Index Measurements.评估自动容积描记踝臂指数设备在周围动脉疾病检测中的应用:与多普勒踝臂指数测量的对比研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2023 Aug 5;29:e940829. doi: 10.12659/MSM.940829.
8
Assessment of peripheral artery disease risk in building construction workers by Ankle-Brachial index measurement with automated oscillometric and hand-held Doppler device.使用自动示波和手持式多普勒设备通过踝臂指数测量评估建筑工人外周动脉疾病风险
J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Jan;11(1):139-143. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_102_21. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
9
Automated Measurements of Ankle-Brachial Index: A Narrative Review.踝臂指数的自动测量:一篇叙述性综述。
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 3;10(21):5161. doi: 10.3390/jcm10215161.
10
The ankle brachial index in people with and without diabetes: intra-tester reliability.踝肱指数在糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者中的:内部测试者可靠性。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2020 May 12;13(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13047-020-00389-w.