Suppr超能文献

重新审视道德风险与风险规避之间的权衡。

Reconsidering the moral hazard-risk avoidance tradeoff.

作者信息

Newhouse Joseph P

机构信息

Harvard University, 180 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, United States.

出版信息

J Health Econ. 2006 Sep;25(5):1005-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.06.003. Epub 2006 Jul 24.

Abstract

The received model for optimal demand-side cost sharing trades off moral hazard and risk avoidance. This model appears to lie behind recent increases in initial cost sharing, such as those embodied in Health Savings Accounts and Health Reimbursement Accounts. At the same time there is evidence that lower cost sharing for certain drugs can reduce future total health care costs and/or improve future health, and this may be true of other medical services as well. To the degree that individuals remain in the same common insurance pool, lower cost sharing that induces increases in certain services that reduce total costs, including future costs, represents a classic case for a subsidy and will minimize an employer's labor costs. Even if total costs increase, the value of a change in health could increase more. In that case such a subsidy is consistent with recent work in behavioral economics for those with self-control problems.

摘要

最优需求侧成本分担的传统模型在道德风险和风险规避之间进行权衡。这种模型似乎是近期初始成本分担增加的背后原因,比如健康储蓄账户和健康报销账户所体现的那些。与此同时,有证据表明某些药物较低的成本分担可以降低未来的总体医疗成本和/或改善未来健康状况,其他医疗服务可能也是如此。就个人仍处于同一普通保险池而言,较低的成本分担促使某些能降低总成本(包括未来成本)的服务增加,这是补贴的典型案例,并且会使雇主的劳动力成本降至最低。即使总成本增加,健康状况变化的价值可能增加得更多。在这种情况下,对于有自我控制问题的人来说,这种补贴与行为经济学的近期研究是一致的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验