Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
J Health Econ. 2013 Mar;32(2):463-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.11.010. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
This paper studies the role of Medicare's premium policy in sorting beneficiaries between traditional Medicare (TM) and managed care plans in the Medicare advantage (MA) program. Beneficiaries vary in their demand for care. TM fully accommodates demand but creates a moral hazard inefficiency. MA rations care but disregards some elements of the demand. We describe an efficient assignment of beneficiaries to these two options, and argue that efficiency requires an MA program oriented to serve the large middle part of the distribution of demand: the "middle class." Current Medicare policy of a "single premium" for MA plans cannot achieve efficient sorting. We characterize the demand-based premium policy that can implement the efficient assignment of enrollees to plans. If only a single premium is feasible, the second-best policy involves too many of the low-demand individuals in MA and a too low level of services relative to the first best. We identify approaches to using premium policy to revitalize MA and improve the efficiency of Medicare.
本文研究了医疗保险的保费政策在医疗保险优势(MA)计划中对传统医疗保险(TM)和管理式医疗计划之间的受益人的分类作用。受益人对医疗服务的需求存在差异。TM 完全满足需求,但会产生道德风险效率低下。MA 限制了医疗服务,但忽略了需求的某些要素。我们描述了一种将受益人有效地分配到这两种选择的方法,并认为效率要求 MA 计划面向服务于需求分布的大中部分:“中产阶级”。当前医疗保险的 MA 计划“单一保费”政策无法实现有效的分类。我们描述了一种基于需求的保费政策,可以实现对计划参与者的有效分配。如果只可行单一保费,那么次优政策会涉及到太多的低需求人群在 MA 中,而且相对于最优政策,服务水平太低。我们确定了使用保费政策来振兴 MA 并提高医疗保险效率的方法。